“If a court grants relief, which under the circumstances it hasn’t any authority to grant, its judgment is to that extent void.”[1]
“A void judgment is no judgment at all and is without legal effect.”[2]
“A court must vacate any judgment entered in excess of its jurisdiction.”[3]
A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Federal decisions addressing void state court judgments include [4]
Void Orders Can Be Attacked At Any Time
“An order that exceeds the jurisdiction of the court, is void, or voidable, and can be attacked in any proceeding in any court where the validity of the judgment comes into issue.”[5]
Great Harm on National Interests Arising from Void Orders
To be clear, I know full well that my words are Heresy & Blasphemy in our Christain Sugar Schedule Cartel Empire. Since the turn of the 20th Century we have in fact formally tatted or stamped owned by the oldest empire, in part, still breathing (Vatican’s “In God We Trust” in flat violation of America’s “no establishment of any generic god” clause.) God, so you know, is the biggest stock holding enterprise around – Vatican, Inc., who has a big stake in Silicon’s Boner for Bill!
Shifting, here are some parallel facts from another case:
Federal judges issued orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in federal courts.
After Judges Robert Jones and Edward Jellen corruptly seized and started to liquidate Stich’s assets, Judge Jones issued an unconstitutional order barring Stich from filing any objection to the seizure and liquidation.
IN STING RE: JOHNNY F. WALTER’S WALKING PAPERS
Parliament, Mr. Walter is working for, so you know!
[1] 1 Freeman on Judgments, 120-c.
[2] Jordon v. Gilligan, 500 F.2d 701, 710 (6th Cir. 1974))
[3] Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Bd. No. 27, 453 F.2d 645 (1st Cir. 1972).).
[4] Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L ed 370.
[5] (See Rose v. Himely (1808) 4 Cranch 241, 2 L ed 608; Pennoyer v. Neff (1877) 95 US 714, 24 L ed 565; Thompson v. Whitman (1873) 18 Wall 457, 21 l ED 897; Windsor v. McVeigh (1876) 93 US 274, 23 L ed 914; McDonald v. Mabee (1917) 243 US 90, 37 Sct 343, 61 L ed 608.
