Two Faced Walter’s Back Door Deals – Breaches Sidways

Fact:     In every single one of Bill’s cases, the court guardians roundly ruled facts of fraud existed” & approved both the settlements & fees, confirming that Bill did his job representing We The People.

 

Fact:     Out of his own pocket, Bill compensates We The People named plaintiff to step up & assist, en mass.  And now, the court pretends that somehow Bill came up on ill-gotten gains; the gaps in the legally empty conclusions are glaring.

 

Fact:     But for Bill, in every single one of his client recruitment efforts, Walter’s corporate clients might have gotten away with their flat felony pyramid scheme stock price manipulation, up & down!

 

Fact:     There is no victim of any “loss” or of any “common law” crime here, yet A.G., Inc., a stock held company (literally) is coming up on loads – buy stock in A.G.!

 

Fact:     Jones Day et al Defense firms love Bill Lerach, as he made them dirty rich too!

 

Fact:     Defense firm bosses, S.E.C., Inc., issued the law “hit” on Lerach & Milberg, to slow down addressing their open & shut financial fraud by the infected law scripts (anointed by Wall Street) that Bill was permitted to formally file by.

 

            Next, I shift to some truly shocking words by a not above the law man Walter:

 

 “In the court’s view, Mr. Lerach’s conduct is one of the most serious crimes to come before this court,” Walter said. “The scope and duration … was breathtaking.”

 

Tainted Cases – The “D” Cons-piracy

 

Mr. Walter rejoined that Lerach “benefited for years after he stopped actively recruiting clients to the conspiracy by collecting millions … in fees from tainted cases.”

 

“The conduct to me just goes to the core of the judicial system,” Walter said.

 

Walter noted that Lerach had not sought to lighten his sentence by agreeing to cooperate in the government’s ongoing investigation of Milberg Weiss and co-founder Melvyn Weiss.  In addition to the prison term, Lerach agreed to forfeit $7.75 million in unlawful gains, pay a $250,000 fine and serve two years of probation. He is set to report to federal prison in California on April 21.[1]

 

What is “breathtaking” here are the failures of jurisdiction & back door Article desertion – agreed upon my Johnnie Walter!  I note that Mr. Walter & his team have been in actual possession of my proof files about “IT” since 11-07, which includes, e.g.:

 

Ex        My Kendrick Field Files;

Ex        My Ben Bernanke Field Files; &

Ex        My Field FOIA Disclosures, A-K!

Now I don’t think Mr. Walter, in concert with Mr. Cheng & Axel, desire to be brought up on Equal kick back Protection clause treason charges in my other formal presentation, but I could be WONG.  What do you think?

 

III.       JUDGING MISBEHAVIOR IN THE ORDINARY COURTS

 

A.        Removal as a Consequence of a Criminal Conviction

B.         Civil Forfeiture of an Office

C.        Judicial Disciplinary Proceedings

D.        Defining Misbehavior

 

“The limitations inherent in the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law extend to judicial as well as political branches of government, so that a judgment may not be rendered in violation of those constitutional limitations and guarantees.”[2]

 

“A void judgment is not entitled to the respect accorded a valid adjudication, but may be entirely disregarded, or declared inoperative by any tribunal in which effect is sought to be given to it. It is attended by none of the consequences of a valid adjudication. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place. … It is not entitled to enforcement … All proceedings founded on the void judgment are themselves regarded as invalid.”[3]

“A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Federal decisions addressing void state court judgments include Kalb[4] & Ex parte Rowland (1882)

 

“A judgment which is void upon its face, and which re­quires only an inspection of the judgment roll to demonstrate its wants of vitality is a dead limb upon the judicial tree, which should be lopped off, if the power to do so exists.”[5]

 

“If a court grants relief, which under the circumstances it hasn’t any authority to grant, its judgment is to that extent void.”  An illegal order is forever void.[6]



[1] http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20080212-9999-1b12lerach.html

[2] Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 2 L Ed 2d 1283, 78 S Ct 1228.

[3] 30A Am Jur Judgments 44, 45.

[4] Kalb v. Feuerstein 308 US 433 (1940).

[5] People v. Greene, 71 Cal. 100 [16 Pac. 197, 5 Am. St. Rep. 448].

[6] (1 Freeman on Judgments, 120-c.) An illegal order is forever void.

There are no comments on this page.

Leave a Reply