Dear Mr. President (Dwarf Alfonso):
Tonight, 08-25-07, I learned that you dipped me from my earned schedule seniority list from above Nick, Melissa, & Courtney to under Nick, Melissa & Courtney. Last week you gave me my typical three shifts, Melissa three, Nick three. You gave Courtney, who left her seniority position & went to N.Y a while back & recently returned, two shifts, instead of putting her on call & waiting for an opening. You did this knowing all three of us are in need of more shifts to pay our bills.[1]
All of a sudden, for this coming week, you gave Courtney the two shifts you gave her last week & my entire three shifts property, leaving me with nothing, knowing I have rent & other bills due.[2] You calculated to do this & you calculated to do IT in silence.
You calculated to divest me of my work property without a single word to me. You did so after a hand full of dated, legitimate written work related correspondence concerns, including, in core part:
A) Your taking my tips to pay your managers (in banquets) Labor Code Violation;
B) Me expressing my feelings about your $15.00 something for nothing wine cork “tying” practice, telling me (agency) to tell our clients that the $15.00 charge is based on some mysterious “costs,” which you refuse to simply show, for example;
C) Me writing a thank you card to the kitchen staff & asking their permission to suggest to you that you give them a raise or some recognition for their loyal, hard work in that hot kitchen, & posting it on our employee cork board;[3] &
D) Me writng a wine article about your wine & our work manual, which you (agent Michel), suggested I write as he suggested I write, for US, a labor rules code Manual.
Why did you remove that nice, labor rules thank you card from our employee board?
Now, you didn’t show up to either of our last two work meetings, at which I was looking forward to asking you about my recent, small hand full of dated, outlined work-labor related questions, concerns & suggestions, in person. I am very stressed out. I owe $180.00 ish in car (G-TI) insurance plus in a few days, which I don’t have. I owe rent coming up too.
If I am mistaken & there was simply an oversight in my schedule please let me know. My aunt & I are about 1 month away from not being able to pay her mortgage & loosing her home, which adds to the necessity of my job & my shifts.
Examples of wrongful dismissal include:
A) Retaliation for … reporting on illegal employer activity (a.k.a. whistleblowing);
B) Dismissal for a wrongful cause; &/or
C) Dismissal without going through a contractually mandated dismissal process, which might involve an escalating series of warning letters, &c, where grounds.
I swear under penalty of perjury the above facts are true.
G-Wiz Delros
Dear Manger K. Messner, Agent for Delcros’s Alonso & Arminta Bishop & Embezzler Jody (Off The Books Keepers):
I hope this work speech finds you well. Earlier, you had “a couple of questions for me.” I hope you don’t mind, but I could sure use your clarification about work.
First thing, I don’t know for sure why you, for example, you ordered Courtney away from me when we were having a couple minute, pleasant conversation about New York at the end of my last shift on Sunday August 25, 2007.
Second thing, I don’t know for sure why you, for example, took away my scheduled Tuesday, Banquet Saturday, & Brunch Sunday property shifts.
Third thing, I don’t know for sure why you would not permit me to be on call to pick up shifts for Hilde Brooks on Sunday, August 26th, 2007, for example.
Fourth thing, I don’t know for sure why you, the assistant manager, won’t talk to me about any of IT. I think we have some major work related communication problems.
Fifth thing, you are a manager. Consistent with your title, unlike Albert or anyone else, you are the sole person, apart from Michel, who is allowed to do contracts for, show & book Banquets, who has a Key to A., J.’s advertised 32,000 bottles of wine cellars, who is allowed to enter those cellars & re-stock the $35.00 to $300 plus per bottle of wines, for example. Your hourly pay stubs plus the below,, unlike others who have been waiting & still wait for minimum wage, confirms that you are a 351 manager.
Those facts met, all of a sudden, on Tuesday, August 21, 2007, you shifted & said to me, “oh, I am not a manger.” You did so after I first orally reminded you of rule 351 – you, a manager, have been stealing my & all other banquet servers’ banquet tips, which I did many months ago. You continued to do it plus, then I wrote a memo on it.
You agreed, with Prsident A., J., CPA A. Bishop, & M.D. to rig for yourself a 5% skim off the top of every Banquet tip left for the servers, when you aren’t serving. Unlike when I am on the floor, the four of you first thought about it, then spoke about it, then agreed to cut yourselves this 5% skim. You set in place a totally different Banquet Payment operation procedure, in which you take, control & allocate yourselves, without permission, our tip Banquet tip money. This you agreed is in direct contrast our main dining room payment procedure, in which all servers “Cash & Carry” our banks.
Next, you make US Banquet servers claim 100% of our 15%, minus your 5%, mandated tip on banquet bills. You only make us claim 8% when we are on the floor. You post our “short” numbers on the employee bulleting board to get us to voluntarily claim your mandated 8% (Floor) 15% (Banquet) thing.
I don’t know IF you claim the 5% you take from US without asking, banquet wise. Please advise. I’d also like an accounting from your Ms. Bishop, on her computer, identifying exactly what you pay & are refunded with my & your tip figures. Lastly, because I don’t know for sure, so can you tell me my schedule for this week; I have bad insomnia & gum stress rashes not knowing; I owe big bills & I need & I want to work?
09-16-07
G-Wiz – Big Gamble Delcros & Kari Butter Lips
Date: 08-20-07
Dear Harry Dwarf, Delcros & McBean Counter’s Bishop, A & Jody:
Due the rule ordering US to faithfully do the math before we charge anyone anything, and due to the fact that you have not responded to my requests from you about the math, in connection with what Michel asked me to do, I present the following:
Today is 8-20-007, & this is a formatted summary of some facts & rules for the business book Michel Delcros suggested I write, which I am furnishing to you all for the first time since began working on our work manual, for US..
I was orally instructed by the Boss (Agency) to tell my clients this, verbatim:
If you want to contract with me for my food, & if you want to enjoy wine with the food you contract with me for, then you must either:
A Buy A Glass Or Bottle From ME/The boss (Agent); or
B) Pay Me/The Boss (Agent) $15.00 To Cork Your own bottle.
You may not, however, bring your own bottle IF IT is on my wine list. My boss won’t allow me to open IT, & he won’t allow you to uncork IT yourself. I am not to allow anyone to use the use their own corkscrew, open their own wine, use the empty wine glass on the table, poor & drink their own wine with the $20.00 to $$75.00 per plate they contract for & buy from Me/The Boss (Agency).
Even though corking a bottle of wine “costs” a flat net zero in additional over-head, the boss (Agent) told me to tell my clients that that $15.00 contract charge for nothing is based on “costs,” which is metaphysically untrue. I am very uncomfortable lying to clients about “costs,” but fear he will fire me if I do not lie for him. My clients get zero in return for that $15.00 side contract charge, which renders IT an facially void contract charge. This unfaithful comment on the real simple rule applies:
“It is based on a … measure reflecting customer’s [willingness] … to pay, which is totally unrelated to cost …, which … determine[s the] price.”
Between the boss & the one he has a contract with (book keeper/rival price checker), doing IT is:
“[D]escribed as a “good source of [extra, free] revenue”-pursuant to a strategy of “maximizing … [revenue] income [calculating to skirt core contract rules].”
Now, we don’t charge anyone when they drink only the water with the food they contract for. I suppose some would think that is real good contract business if one could figure out a way to do that.
Next, when I was quested about IT, I asked the boss (Agent), who told me (Agent), verbatim: “I won’t make ANY money if I don’t charge $15.00 for a 5 minute max bottle retrieving & opening, which I pay you $7.50 per hour to do. I don’t know why the Boss tells me things he knows are untrue, like using the word “ANY” when the unbendable reality is that the Boss wouldn’t make “as much for doing nothing” if he respected the real simple rules of “consideration” in each contract he enters, a la cart.
I understand that English is a second language for the Boss, but I think he knows the different Webster’s dictionary definitions between the words “ANY” as opposed to “AS MUCH”.
Because of IT, I have lost sleep, broken out in a rash, & am very stressed out about loosing my income, being fired or having shifts taken from me in retaliation for raising IT, which is something the boss told me [Agency] I should be concerned about. I do love my job, but I am personally liable to my clients for each $15.00 I accept, under false contract pretences, which I don’t get any commission on. The Boss pockets all of it. I have communicated with a counselor about IT & she told me that IT is unhealthy not to raise it in a constructive way. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I should do? I think I might need more psychological counseling for it. Thank God IT doesn’t happen that often.
I want to serve & charge my clients in line with the rules of honesty, good faith & fair contract dealing rules that I learned in JR. College Business (Contract basics) & Economic (Basics) Class.
I feel dirty every time I have to do IT:
Conditioning the purchase of one thing on the purchase of another, without regard to correct price protocol. It is a combination for the exactly same reason that getting a local rivals prices & using that as a gage to set one’s own prices, without regard to costs is a combination (U.S. v. Container, 393 U.S. 333 (69)): it is not a faithful cost measure, divided by hoped units (plates) to be sold, & a set price, one by one, accordingly.
It is called Tying. It crosses the black letter & spirit of the Code, which is faith:
A. You … determine the price of [all charges] … based on the [direct costs embodied in serving]…the [thing]….
I work with good to the core people, honest souls. I don’t think I am the only one that feels the way I feel about IT. I know, from first hand experience, how clients feel about IT – not one bit happy!
Now I am far from perfect & I have a whole lot to work on with me, but I want to be as faithful as I can to the way I know we are supposed to treat our clients & each other, charge wise, which involves the spirit of good faith:
The Spirit of Laws (French: De l’esprit des lois) is a treatise on political theory first published anonymously by Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu in 1748. Originally published anonymously partly because Montesquieu’s works were subject to censorship, its influence outside of France was aided by its rapid translation into other languages. In 1750 Thomas Nugent published the first English translation. In 1751 the Catholic Church added De l’esprit des lois to its Index Librorum Prohibitorum (“List of Prohibited Books”). Yet Montesquieu’s political treatise had an enormous influence on the work of many others, most notably: Catherine the Great, who produced Nakaz (Instruction); the framers of the United States Constitution; and Alexis de Tocqueville, who applied Montesquieu’s methods to a study of American society, in Democracy in America.
I hear a whole lot about “costs” from people, but no one has ever shown me a single document to back up what they say about IT, which is the essence of faith. I don’t know why others simply parrot what they hear the big book-keeper or owner say, without an iota of proof.
I do love my job & I love the people I work with, but I don’t want to get in trouble. My integrity means something to me too. I don’t want to get in trouble. You don’t think Juan & Michel will punish me for reminding them, seasoned business rule operators, for mentioning this do you? I so, please let me know & I will stop right now because I desperately need my job to pay my rent, car costs, gas & utilities. My God MoMother & I are hand to mouth, literally, & I am definitely afraid of relation for being honest. But, due to the fact that everyone says what an honest men M-Shell & Dwarf are, I don’t really think they would commit such a wicked crime against me or anyone else for being straight, do you?
I VALUE YOU ALL
Esteban, Alex, George & everyone else in the kitchen, I want you to know that I value you. As Mr. Edmond Burke said, “Your daily labor is noble; IT is holy. Like Ceasar Chavez (a true American Icon) advanced, Burke said, about your very hard, faithful labor, “you are dignified & appreciated” – we, the wait staff, could not do our job without you. It is honorable that you, like many others, “earn your way by the sweat of your brow.” It is hot in that kitchen, about which no one complains about. And you treat me & everyone with absolute respect, which, in my experience; I can’t say about other restaurants I have worked at, like the Hyatt, Marriott, Sizzler & Red Lion.
You have been nothing but helpful & courteous to me, the new guy, which makes, for me, working with you all a fantastic experience. Your preparation of the plates we serve is impeccable, to the “T”. I forget to tell you about all the compliments I get about your service. I love working with you & our entire team, so you know. One wise man, modified, said about us, “collective labor alone gives life & value to the service face of this partnership; our time, together, is the stock that makes it tic.
I have to be honest with you all. I feel guilty about the fact that I make a lot in tips & that we don’t pool & split them together, because we all earned IT together. I know that our hourly rates are in a narrow ambit range, between $7.50 & $11.00 or so, but with the gratuities from clients that I get my hourly is much more – $20.00 pr hour plus, on average, so you know. I accept that there nothing I can do about that, without rocking the boat. Of course, I do need that to make ends meet too, with rent & car bills; but when I think about it I feel uneasy knowing that you all work about equally as hard (and in the heat, without an air conditioning unit or fan), yet I double what you take home. I see how you guys sweat back there, with the hot ovens, & I think to myself – wow – those guys are real troopers.
So you know, my counselor told me that it is healthy to express things like this, for better communications & relations, which I have not been too good at in my past. Hilde, e.g., is much better than I am at acknowledging your value, with birthday cakes, for example. I am not in touch that way.
I feel privileged to work side by side with people of your dedication, patience, & talents. I sure can’t do what you do. I enjoy watching you all work your magic with your timing & presentations. You are truly skilled & I want you to know that I know that.
With your consent, I want to suggest to Juan that he consider a raise or bonus this year.
P.S. I regret talking a bit too loud about the cork thing on Sunday night. I wasn’t thinking that our clients in the small room might hear me. IT happened again that night & I had to say what Juan told me to say, which he & I both know isn’t true. It gave me a flash back, from other jobs too. I again took it to Dwarf directly, so you know. And I shall be more mindful of whispering in the future.
TIPS
T-RaVice:
Dear Manger K. Messner, Agent for Juan Alonso, Michel Delcors & Arminta Bishop:
I hope this work speech finds you well. Earlier, you had “a couple of questions for me.” I hope you don’t mind, but I could sure use your clarification about work.
First thing, I don’t know for sure why you, for example, you ordered Courtney away from me when we were having a couple minute, pleasant conversation about New York at the end of my last shift on Sunday August 25, 2007.
Second thing, I don’t know for sure why you, for example, took away my scheduled Tuesday, Banquet Saturday, & Brunch Sunday property shifts.
Third thing, I don’t know for sure why you would not permit me to be on call to pick up shifts for Hilde Brooks on Sunday, August 26th, 2007, for example.
Fourth thing, I don’t know for sure why you, the assistant manager, won’t talk to me about any of IT. I think we have some major work related communication problems.
Fifth thing, you are a manager. Consistent with your title, unlike Albert or anyone else, you are the sole person, apart from Michel, who is allowed to do contracts for, show & book Banquets, who has a Key to A., J.’s advertised 32,000 bottles of wine cellars, who is allowed to enter those cellars & re-stock the $35.00 to $300 plus per bottle of wines, for example. Your hourly pay stubs plus the below,, unlike others who have been waiting & still wait for minimum wage, confirms that you are a 351 manager.
Those facts met, all of a sudden, on Tuesday, August 21, 2007, you shifted & said to me, “oh, I am not a manger.” You did so after I first orally reminded you of rule 351 – you, a manager, have been stealing my & all other banquet servers’ banquet tips, which I did many months ago. You continued to do it plus, then I wrote a memo on it.
You agreed, with Prsident A., J., CPA A. Bishop, & M.D. to rig for yourself a 5% skim off the top of every Banquet tip left for the servers, when you aren’t serving. Unlike when I am on the floor, the four of you first thought about it, then spoke about it, then agreed to cut yourselves this 5% skim. You set in place a totally different Banquet Payment operation procedure, in which you take, control & allocate yourselves, without permission, our tip Banquet tip money. This you agreed is in direct contrast our main dining room payment procedure, in which all servers “Cash & Carry” our banks.
Next, you make US Banquet servers claim 100% of our 15%, minus your 5%, mandated tip on banquet bills. You only make us claim 8% when we are on the floor. You post our “short” numbers on the employee bulleting board to get us to voluntarily claim your mandated 8% (Floor) 15% (Banquet) thing.
I don’t know IF you claim the 5% you take from US without asking, banquet wise. Please advise. I’d also like an accounting from your Ms. Bishop, on her computer, identifying exactly what you pay & are refunded with my & your tip figures. Lastly, because I don’t know for sure, so can you tell me my schedule for this week; I have bad insomnia & gum stress rashes not knowing; I owe big bills & I need & I want to work?
09-16-07
Date: 09-29-07
Dear Mercedes Dwarf, Delcros & Arminta:
I am writing in connection with some of the current reimbursements of which you are aware, based on the series of diplomatic communications I have confirmed to you directly, to which you have agreed, with your management team, to deny me.
In the spirit of cooperation, I provide the following numbers owing. Foremost, caused directly by your express violations of outlined crimes, you have converted from me about $2,000 per month in undisputed pay (base + tips). So you know, I have endeavored, since the day you stole my shifts from me, to secure other employment to mitigate your damages (See Proof Ex___).
Second, I am still waiting for your check in connection with the Labor Code section 351 tip money of mine, which you converted from me (See Proof Ex___).
Third, as I previously outlined to you, you didn’t pay me the right numbers on every check you cut me since 02-07; you super shorted me. (See Proof Ex____).
So you know, I received a car insurance cancellation notice, which I previously told you about, causes by your mal fides, which I briefed you on (See Proof Ex___AAA). It sure would take some of the stress off me if you would use some of my money that you have won’t return to me to satisfy my $248.40 insurance bill. It is foreseeable that:
A) IF I get cancelled I might get in an accident, after (damages);
B) IF I get cancelled, I might get a tax bill called ticket (damages); &
C) IF I get canceled, I might suffer even more emotional stress (damages).
Fourth, I have more bills that I am behind on: Rent, electricity, phone & so forth. I would sure appreciate it if you would cut me at least some of my money you converted from me so that I can survive, curbing a little bit of the stress, humiliation & embarrassment you have intentionally caused me among my family, friends & peers (Realty Executives). (See Proof Ex ___).
My Power Point presentation, if this isn’t resolved without further intentional tort delay, so you know, shall confirm that you alone are accountable for these plus a host of other itemized, verified damages. (Proof Ex ___). This shall be one standard:
The question, “How would a reasonable person act under the same or similar circumstances” performs a critical role in legal reasoning in areas such as common law negligence and contract law. A test demanding respect to rules that “a prudent man in a position of trust would observe.”
By: IT
Quick Books
All Of IT
Agua Dulce, CA 91350
Dear Mr. President (Date: 10-03-07)
This is to confirm that your lead manager, Michel D., who is an alternative lifestyle man, solicited me multiple times, while on the job. I don’t like thinking about his attempts to seduce me, knowing that I, like Melissa, desired more shifts to pay my bills, because I told him so.
First, Michel D. specifically told me, a few months after he hired me, that he thought I was gay, like him. Specifically, he said, verbatim: “When I hired you I thought you were gay.”
Second, when I asked M.D. if their was anything I could do to pick up more shifts, like put a note up on our staff cork board, to host, bar back, serve or whatever, M.D. told me:
“If you want more [work] /shifts all you have to do is come to my office with me.”
Third, M.D. specifically used U.S. (e) postal roads to solicit me, using Ms. P.C., to view his life partners’ (Steve Corry) X rated man/man oil paint web site stuff this way, in part, verbatim:
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 22:11:02 +0200 – Subject: Steven web site
From: daxurit@yahoo.com [Steve’s “IT” partner Michel’s e-mail to me]
To: bosswooman@hotmail.com
Hello Cash, on line portfolio of gay-related paintings at the following :
http://www.PictureTrail.com/gid8931562
Now I want you to know that I like M.D., I think he is a fine person. I merely cite facts & have absolutely no problem working with him. To the contrary, I appreciate his adult humor. What isn’t very nice, however, is that you all assaulted Ms. P.C., a 100% non-party in this matter, to intimidate me not to do exactly what is required of me, addressing your teams crimes, peacefully by (e) air line fact/rule press & petition, of your state anointed (incorporation) Federal Crimes, like D.C.-Cal. labor code 351 theft. About your crimes I outlined, your proxy, S.C., verbatim said that you all got “… a lot of laughter over [it]….” You really crossed over into savage ground when you agreed to have Steve do what he did to Ms. P.C., who likes nice red wine by the way. It won’t be necessary for me to address that if we resolve all of it before hand. And, for your information, the fact that Mike Dunkel, is on your payroll, like Bert Boeckman’s, by your capitation sales tax, does not discharge duty in connection with any of it.
Respectfully,
Mercedes G-TI & Hat – K-Kat
Agua Dulce, CA 91350
Re: Vindictive Dwarf & Delcros Dismissals
This chapter is very important. I shall reference my Fred Frederick’s (Prudential) termination, when I was 15, for drinking lemonade in the break room when I was a bus boy, as an example.
There, I was terminated without anyone ever telling me. I never called in sick, I worked for others when management was in a pinch, I had glowing comments from clients & had never been formally written up. As a minor, I worked long bus shifts without an owed break. Mid shift, sweating, I poured some lemonade, dehydrated. A new manager (Sid) saw me, barked, I reminded him of the rules 15 minute break, which he never gave me & I which I never complained about, but just needed a quick cup of lemonade. He didn’t like my tone I guess. He continued to use me (after deciding to clip me), then had my shift covered & clipped me, my dignity, my self esteem, my reputation, my putting food on the table & so forth. He without a word to me about it. Later he made up a fib about “insubordination.” Servants (like me) aren’t allowed to speak about stuff with Fred Fredericks, e.g..
DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE TO THE RULES
Wrongful termination is the most common term used. But an unfair employment discharge is also referred to as: [Malicous] Wrongful discharge. A related concept is called constructive dismissal, also called constructive discharge, is where an employee resigns because of their employer’s behaviour. The employee must prove that the behaviour was unfair — that the employer’s actions amounted to a fundamental breach of contract or the law. The employee may resign over a single serious incident or over a pattern of incidents. Generally, the employee must have resigned soon after the incident. The notion of constructive dismissal comes from the concept that (as it is phrased in United Kingdom law) “An employer must not, without reasonable or proper cause, conduct himself in a manner calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence between the employer and the employee.”
Well-stated facts confirming outrageous behavior, is always a possibility, so we need to mindful of the reasons if we ever wish to discontinue our work partnership with them. Hypothetically, if the shot caller isn’t mindful of the rules, management needs to be very careful not to adopt, by act or omitting to act in the wake of the obvious duty, another’s misdeeds. [Mathew 1-18].
I now cite some real cases & real numbers to keep us mindful of the risk involved for disrespecting the rules of how we are all expected to behave, because we don’t want our profit sharing numbers to be paid out for something silly if it can be avoided.
“Wrongful termination lawsuits first became controversial in the late 1980’s, because a series of California court of appeals decisions had permitted some employees to recover damages for emotional distress and punitive damages from employers who fired them in bad faith. Verdicts in some wrongful termination cases reached into the millions of dollars; credible estimates of average verdicts ranged from $452,5702 to $646,855.3”
3. Independent torts
A wrongful termination plaintiff can also recover emotional distress and punitive damages if she proves that the employer engaged in conduct that was independently tortious, in addition to firing her. For example, an employee might claim that in addition to firing her, the employer made statements that were defamatory or violated her right to privacy. Again, however, recent case law limits these claims. If the employer’s conduct causes a [psychological] physical injury [Osha] connected to the job, workers’ compensation may provide the sole relief.44 Further, if the tortious conduct occurs in connection with the termination itself — for example, if an employer were to lie about the reasons for a termination — only an action based on the termination can be pursued.
The Department of Trade and Industry states:
A tribunal may rule that an employee who resigns because of conduct by his or her employer has been ‘constructively dismissed’. For a tribunal to rule in this way the employer’s action has to be such that it can be regarded as a significant breach of the employment contract indicating that he or she intends no longer to be bound by one or more terms of the contract: an example of this might be where the employer arbitrarily demotes an employee to a lower rank or poorer paid position.
It’s a world of laughter, a world or tears
its a world of hopes, its a world of fear
theres so much that we share
that its time we’re aware
its a small world after all
Dwarf’s Delros/Corry called Ms. P.y out of the blue & said this to her, verbatim:
A) I know where you live -itch.
B) Get ready. Get fu–ing Ready.
C) Do you understand me – get ready.
That mean speech call triggered a lot, including Ms. P didn’t do an open house at her Crown Court Condo listing.
Shifting to some dabs of time & date pegged fact communication logs:
Can anyone help me out here with something I am very confused about?
…
Does anyone have any idea what Dwarf & Corry are talking about in this bizarre message they left Polly yesterday morning?
…
Corry Message Left On Ms. P’s Land Line at 10:04 A.M. on Thursday, September 13, 2007, from his telephone log record number 213-999-999.
…
P, who has never had a single written free speech communication with Mr. Corry & has nothing to do with anything in this regard – I did, accidentally copying him on work related business papgers, the 4th Amendment, which Michel suggested I write about in connection with our work. Alonso’s Steven said to a non-party, Polly, verbatim:
Yea, fuck off bitch. Yea I called your office & I told them that we are having this problem. I told them that I am going to the board.
And if you — . Right now I am sitting with the man upstairs who is very sick & upset because of the way you two morons have acted.
You send me another one of these [work rule & fact Manual memo that the man upstairs, Michel who suggested IT be written & sent] e-mails [fliers about inside facts & act] or send my ex wife’s husband an e-mail or either one of my daughters.
I know where you live bitch. I know that she is a looser. He is a looser & she is dumb & he is an idiot. So maybe you are too.
And I’ve called your cell phone & you don’t answer that either. Get ready. Get fucking Ready. Do you understand me – get ready.
[End of Message].
We in no way condone the fowl language Dwarf & Delcros’ Corry employed as intimidation scare tactics to censor simple facts & rules of flat felony behavior, including Delcros’ false Tax Income claims by way of thousands a year, for over 15 years, from single, struggling mothers.
AM Burr
LETS GET READY, FOR WHAT?
IT SOUNDS EXCITING DOESN’T IT?
First, Executive Realty suggested that P speak with her co-worker, Boss Dwarf, about his Corry potty mouth, which is a good idea. I was also thinking about asking for an advisory opinion about the below, after a full, short, precision short 20 pager from one of my many guardians, like D.A. Papageorge in Los Angeles. The last time I saw him was at an Anti-Trust seminar in L.A. We speak the same language. Or, I am pretty sure my other guardian, A.G. Anti-Trust Division’s Thomas Barnett, in D.C., (Yale Grad) would be fascinated by our package of work goodies. I am certain my other guardian, Kevin Keenan (Yale) at the ACLU in S.D. would know our Work-Ed-Book, which revives a dormant bodies of “Tying” & protocol, is beyond Best Caliber.
Shifting, one fused lesson about the United to be gleaned from this episode is that there is something called a black & white HARBORING & a 4th Amendment Attempt Action (AAA):
My United Amendment IV is An action Of Right. It guards me against men like Jual attempting to engage unreasonable searches and seizures with his local Sheriff storm troopers, for example. It was designed as a response to the controversial writs of assistance (a type of general search warrant), which were a significant factor behind the United evolution.
It is a standing order that verbatim reads: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….” #4. As illustrated above, some big men have a long history of keeping people in the dark, fibbing & using them to intimidate innocents, in furtherance of their outrageous objectives. Using Corry. Very clever man our P-Nut Alf is. He is also very well business rig connected, locally, with Le Berge & City Slicker, Inc. & his political money things. One of his friends is the 10th Amendment traider – Bob Kellar, for example.
Agua Dulce, CA 91350
Dear Dwarf, Delcros & McBean Counter & Shot Callers:
This memo focuses on this confirmed fact situation. I was told & eye witnessed that:
Some years ago a group came in & paid for dinner & wine. They brought their own projection screen, used it & left it. Instead of returning it to its true owner, it was kept. Since, Arminta rents it for $110.00 to Dr. groups who are in a pinch, at the last minute in need of a projector (in addition to paying for plates & drinks). Servers, paid a flat, fixed $7.50 an hour regardless, bring it out of the closet & set it up, which might take ten minutes = $1.25.
It is a void oral contract offered & paid, evidence by receipts. It is not charged all group clients alike, like those that say, for example, “that’s ridiculous.” It is never charged to group clients who dine in our banquet room, like weddings, who use the screen. It is charged only to private Doctor like group diners who enjoy our Small Room.
The thing is IT costs Arminta zero, literally. Zero in labor time, Zero in hard costs for the screen, which she got for free. The answer is nothing of any “not already accounted for cost value” was traded for $110.00. Stated another way, it is a $110.00 charge for someone in a pinch, because of a script drafted by Arminta to get a little extra whenever she can, instead of the more free services & more servcies at lower costs, which is the rule of faithful contract competition defined, like this rule:
Quid pro quo (Latin for “something for something” or what was swapped for what) indicates a more-or-less equal exchange or substitution of goods for services, for example.
No waiter gets any commission of which I am aware from the “rental sale.” Arminta may, I don’t personally know. I do know that she counts up all the extra money 5 days or so aweek. It is a charge set up, by an in-house Arminta drafted or backed script, based on a clients’ willingness not to challenge it as coming up on another persons hard earned money for nothing. In my protocol field that kind of contract price rig discrimination is called, “not acute business acumen.” Even attempting to do it cements the black & white offense. “Attempt” offenses means just trying to pull it off, even if you don’t, exposes one to the underlying offense. Here, the offer is an attempt – an act to come up for not!
I understand how tempting it is to gain that extra something for nothing. But that sort of false contract offer, from a bigger picture perspective, ends up upping the cost of MD services to US, in the way of both over the counter & prescription medications. I’ve heard, “everyone does it.” I know that Paris’ Hylton did it too, from an X girlfriend of mine who worked there. But I have read about or heard of any exception to THE RULE that reads, “But IF everyone does it, it is O.K. to do.” Translated, that means, “but if everyone does it & you don’t get caught doing it, then the minimal risk is worth taking, absent a class action.”
Now I think we lose customers by attempting to do stuff like that, which isn’t good for business. What do you all think? If this chapter is unclear, I’d be happy to expand on the multiple offenses involved, like the tort like the “reasonable charger person, being contract faithful standard,” for you.
Date: 08-29A-07
By: IT
-07-07
Dear Mr. Juan Alonso’s Court-nee
InTro Facts
Direct Proof Dunk
First, by contract, Juan, Arminta, Michel & Kari1 first orally offered Courtney my assigned property shifts, behind my back. C accepted that oral offer, promising, in return, to keep silent about their stealing server tips & erasing me, for valuable property shifts that she otherwise would not had access to. After being asked, C also agreed to pay J.A.M.-K. 5% of her event tips, like a strip club dancer.2 Upon securing C’s oral agreement, to insure she was on-board with the nefarious theft cover-up & plot to erase me agenda, J.A.M.-K. did as promised, giving C my shift property (in writing) behind my back, confirmed by back to back schedules, one with me mid-range in rank & my 3 shifts, the next drop-kicked to last place & cut 100%.
Second, after seeing the schedule, scared, I asked master M, “am I am I being demoted to zero for doing the restaurant rule thing, like you asked?. M said to me, verbatim, “You are not being punished nor are you being let go, you’re just being put on call this week.”
Third, it was a flat lie, by a series of Cartwright Code section 16720 (e) “obligations” to lie to me about it, to ignore me about it, & boycott me, by silent excommunication, about it. To be further sneaky about it, a couple weeks later when I came in for brunch on a Sunday, I was given the employee 25% discount by Sunny N, to make it seem as if I was merely put on call.
Fourth, in concert, all five acted & accomplished their goal – to erase me by reducing my income thousands of dollars a month to zero in on shot, without a single word to me. They did so for property (money -C) & to maintain a standing combination of Code 351 theft plus.
Some undisputed & dated fact memos about IT are attached Direct Ev. Proof. Controlling rules about the named individuals’ personal liability for their intentional agenda to clip my sole source of income, rendering it an un-insurable charge, are all defined:
! For purposes of … [the rules] … [about acts by two or more people that "A"ffect the price (income) of another, … shall include ... individuals [like Courtney]….3
! Because the Cartwright Act (e) obligates are confirmed, the strip Cash acts are 16722 “absolutely void,” meaning there is no defense & Cash is owed money; &
! A C-JAM “injunction,” meaning my ordered rank back & a formal reinstatement.
Damages for the savages confirmed acts mandate every cent “of loss of income (price) I would have earned but for but for the animal like behavior of C-JAM-K, that’s what “treble” means. $6,000 per month is the black & white number on this single claim under the Cartwright Act, Cal. Business & Professions Code Section 16720 et sec. Naturally, garnishing (MAC’s checks) is an option. Each ring member is individually liable to me for all of it, plus my advocate for me hourly price (fee), using the sole legal price protocol, which I have produced: $300 per hour. I spend about 2-3+ hours on each pager; another element of mandated damages – always.
Naturally, I shall represent me, speech-wise plus, because I & single moms are worth IT.
Dear Dwarf & McBean Counter Bishop:
Today, 09-05-07, I received a letter from you dated 08-21-07, which was postmarked yesterday, 09-04-07 (P.M.). Did you forget to mail it on the 21st of last month, or did you get the date wrong, or did you backdate it for some odd reason?
Anyway, in your letter you said, “I had no idea you didn’t ring in all of your sales for that day.” Why would you say that knowing that I was the one that brought it to your attention directly? So you know, I incorrectly thought I forgot a coffee on that slip, made a note to myself when I was busy, then I followed up by alerting you to it & I furnished you with four one dollar bills for it. I did that through the bar tender because the contract term you personally inserted into our labor contract, which you enforce, is to charge servers for when our bank is “short,” while you keep it when our bank is “over.” You unilaterally made this a term of our labor contract, orally. And you took my money & gave me a receipt & the 75 cents in change, charging me $3.00 for the coffee & 25 cents for your private sales tax thing. I have the envelope in which you furnished me with both that change & receipt.
So you know, shortly after I mistakenly paid you, I remembered that that table didn’t in fact ever order nor was served that coffee. I didn’t want to disturb your busy day for my small $3.25 refund. With respect, I am curious about your discussions with the CEO & resulting agreement to change your mind about doing that & writing me a check off of your Antelope Valley Bank account for that small number.
Next, I had no idea that this last pay period you, out of the blue, decided to stop charging me a bi-weekly direct capitation state franchise income tax. Did you do that for everyone or did you decide to give just me that VIP staff status, knowing that it is not permitted, past present or future, under a host of rules, like the 10th & 16th Amendment plain English commands combination, for example. Or did this have something to do with my letters to you (plenty is contained in two letters dated 04-13-07 & 08-02-07) about both it & the illegitimate “garnishing” thing that you still haven’t withdrawn from, according to my most recent pay stub, after being double detailed on that open & shut issue expressly?
Now, in your fiduciary role handling our money, would you please explain exactly what you do with every penny of your sales tax, also known as a banned Article 1 “direct capitation” tax? You did say, verbatim, that your sales tax “paper work is balanced daily,” so it’s on the computer.
Both me, as a client, & my clients are curious about something. Do you, as you say, “ring in all of the sales tax revenues for every day”? And do you put our sales tax funds into an interest bearing account? What do you do with the interest, as our fiduciary in connection with that? Do you forward it all to the U.S. Treasury, as Article 1 required?
By the way, I’ve heard & want to thank you, the CFO & the CEO, for giving milk & food to your servants when they run on hard luck & can’t afford to feed, cloth & roof their children, like Amber.
X: IT
X: IT
X: IT
Dear Mr. Fuzzy Dwarf Owner (not) Pres:
I was looking forward to our meeting this morning, but you did not show up for your usual Sunday brunch. I hope you will forgive me for raising my staff, client, & service contract concerns with the two people you gave the title “manager” to. I incorrectly assumed that you had some type of labor & business basic training & manual on these essential points, having been a professional business leader in this Valley for about 27 years. Today my misunderstanding was clarified when one of your “manager” of 18 years told me that he is totally unfamiliar with the controlling labor & business professions codes & rules I presented to you, by proxy, including:
Labor Code Section 351: Tip pooling cannot be used to compensate the owner(s), manager(s), or supervisor(s) of the business, even if these individuals should provide direct table service to a patron.
Labor Code Section 351: It is illegal for employers to make wage deductions from gratuities, or from using gratuities as direct or indirect credits against an employee’s wages. The law further states that gratuities are the sole property of the employee or employees to whom they are given. “Gratuity” is defined….
STAFF PRICE [PAY/COMPENSATION] MANIPULATION RULES:
Extra depends on control over [people’s] labor, [under scales] not [faithful] labor’s value.
Chief among such contracts is that of personal employment [the machines], by which labor and other services are exchanged for money or other forms of property.
If this [consideration] right [in people-service contracts] be struck down or arbitrarily interfered with, there is a substantial impairment of [work] liberty in the long-established constitutional sense.
For purposes of … [the rules &] … section[s] [about acts by two or more people that “A”ffect the price (income) of another, "person" shall include, but not be limited to, individuals [like Arminta Bishop & Courtney]….
With regard to these & other rules I presented, you, this morning your manager clarified the core the communication gap to me today when telling me, aka, “I have never heard of those rules before.”
Liar Liar Bees
Do Not Collect $200 (Monopoly Game Boy = Big X Reality)
Contemptuously, knowing this rule, & my raising it triggered deep Juan treason:
Labor Code Section 351: Tip[s] … cannot be used to compensate the owner(s), manager(s), or supervisor(s) of the business, even if these individuals should provide direct table service to a patron.
The managers, owner, supervisor (Arminta) with over 30 years collective labor code experience in business did just that, Kari & Michel, because Juan & Arminta said they could, which is a black & white theft crime:
In law, conversion is an intentional tort to personal property, where defendant’s unjustified willful interference [skimming for themselves] with the [money] … deprives plaintiff of possession of such [money] chattel. Plaintiff must [and did] have … an immediate right to possession [of the cash] at the time of the wrong.
Joining the ring, to cover their crimes, manager Michel sought & got his live in boyfriend Steve to take affirmative steps to intimidate the cargo into silence about it, which steps are time, date & phone line log recorded (Ex __).
The principles governing this proceding identically track that of the cargo at issue in one case. Verbatim, with slight modifications, that case reads:
…the Queen … presented … a claim, … setting forth, that ‘the vessel [Le Chen] … and her cargo … [the people rental] slaves … are the [U.C.C.] property of Spanish subjects… Amistad, 40 U.S. 518, 525 (1841).
This universal truism rule shall dictate the conclusion in the bigger picture:
“Certain things are not for rent. There is no ownership of oil & gases in the land before bodies bring it to the surface by drilling …, nor of the fruits of others labor. (Real Property, Section 756.) (On clouds-rain, real property, Section 755)
The produce of labor constitutes the natural recompense or wages of labor. Adam Smith – Wealth of [Dwarf] Nats.
Extra depends on control over labor, [under scales] not [faithful] labor’s value. Id.
“Anti-trust laws in general … are the Magna Carta of free enterprise. They are as critical to the preservation of economic freedom & liberty as the Bill of Rights is to the protection of our fundamental personal freedoms.” California Liquor Dealers v. Midcal Aluminum, 445 U.S. 97, 110-111 (1980),
About the above theft, for which Juan Alonso could very well go to jail (straight by the book), Juan’s agent Steve said this, verbatim, at P, a pure innocent in IT all, & openly lying (& libeling me):
–Forwarded Message Attachment–
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:32:40 -0700
From: oilart1949@sbcglobal.net
By: IT
X
X
X
A La Cart (e) Bay Way
I’VE MADE MY LIST
I’VE CHECKED IT TWICE
“As one … cannot, and ten men must strain to lift a ton of weight, yet 100 … can do it only by the strength of a finger of each of them [my 10].” John Betters: “Proposals for Raising a Colledge of Industry.” London, 1696, p. 21.
“Certain things [like people/staff] are not for rent. There is no ownership of oil & gases in the land before bodies bring it to the surface by drilling…; nor of stream-ocean-bodies.
Fixing minimum [wage] prices, like other types of price fixing, is illegal per se. Resale price maintenance was indeed struck down in Dr. Miles … The fact that a state authorizes the price fixing does not, of course, give immunity to the scheme…. Rice v. Alcoholic Bev. etc. Appeals Bd. , 21 Cal.3d 431, @440 (1978)
Utility then is not the measure of exchangeable value, although it is absolutely essential to it.” David Ricardo (ALL forgot contracts core covenant: price right). B & P Code 16720 (e) (stock contracts are 16722 “void”)
“Anti-trust laws in general, & the Sherman Act in particular, are the Magna Carta of free enterprise. They are as critical to the preservation of economic freedom & liberty as the Bill of Rights is to the protection of our fundamental personal freedoms.” Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373.
THE ENTIRE TEAM WHO
CREATED “IT” OWNS “IT” ALL
Predator Juan’s scales way under cost of living, which is flat forbidden. My Juan has known this for 4 months now, but has been trying to starve me into submission silence about it by putting the halt on my EDD check, which he successfully did, after I was awarded IT.
The good guardian is the one who has an eye to every side and angle of contingency, and qualifies all her qualifications, but who throws herself on your part so heartily, that she can get you out of a scrape.
– Ralph Waldo Emerson
IT Spirit Is Faith
THE GOLD-EN RULE
A) “Do unto others, as you have others do unto you.”
Do not steal, from mom
Respect the mother(s)
Work, as Labor is noble
Work, as Labor is holey
Work, as Labor is Value
Work, as Labor is character
Be honest in weights & measures – God’s Command (Leviticus 19)
Be honest in pay scales, pro rata, for those Ex Mas Bonus, quarterly
Q. And that’s something you quote in a number of your articles, isn’t it?
A. Yes. …the most famous quotes in economics.
“In … competitive … price is equal to cost & each seller knows his…cost.”
Q. When it comes to economics – he’s like the founding father, he’s like Thomas Jefferson to economists, isn’t he?
A. Thomas Jefferson, the economist.
If…reasonableness … become an issue…. its … one—alien to … free competition; … not … the … freedom …intended ….”
Q. He is … Jefferson to an economist. He is the … father of it all, right?
A. Like … to the extent we can pinpoint … our discipline, most … identify it as Adam Smith, yes.
Liberty, Adam Smith, calls natural as opposed to artificial pricing:
“The real price of everything, what everything really costs…is the toil & trouble of acquiring it.”
“Labor [time]… is the real measure of…value….”
“Equal quantities of labor, at all times & places, may be said to be of equal value….”
“labor … was the first price, the original purchase-money that was paid for all things.”
The first requisite of civilization is … the assurance that a law once made will not be broken in favor of an individual or group of individuals.
“The most sacred of the duties of a government [is] to do equal and impartial justice to all its citizens.”
“[The] best principles [of our republic] secure to all its citizens a perfect equality of rights.”
“A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.”
“An equal application of law to every condition of woman, infant & minor is fundamental.” (Ju-Veniles).
Dear Dwarf, Delcros & McBean Counters Arminta, Jody (book keeper):
As Michel Delcros asked me to do, this is a reminder about the book-keepers’ felony vendor kick backs rule, called concessions in the Sugar case, which some don’t claim on taxes:
[T]he [felony] practice [of pawning off invoice numbers as one’s real cost] developed on the part of some, but not all, [sellers] … of giving secret concessions [off invoice money for the account. There were some...who never indulged in that practice, but others, called [& confirmed] ‘unethical’ … did so to such an extent that …all…[stuff] sold …carried secret [kick-back] … of some kind.
[Some book keepers, for example,] … falsely represent— [invoice] prices [to clients, the IRS, & on S.E.C. filings, for example] which they said they … procure[d & actually paid] from… sellers.’”
Now, I asked only because I know of some presidents who admitted doing it under oath:
Q. What is the largest [kick-back off invoice] amount of one you can recall?
A. …in excess of $24,000,000 (from Hallmark).
A. We use some of it to put it against our gross margins to smooth out our gross so that we were on a consistent reporting basis – so on a quarterly basis we were able to achieve whatever we wanted to report.
A. If I, I … I … keep that money…. [do you do that Juan? IRS comes down on it]
Q. So … the [invoice] price … went up when you had [unspeakable Sugar] slotting?
A. Absolutely.
A. If I, if I [Harry Dwarf] … I … keep that money….
Now, a former Deloitt & Touche/Author Anderson CPA/Actuary, the winner in Beasley, who was honest, compared to Wells Fargo/Washington Mutual’s Contract hitter Regan. Mr. Layman really likes his scotch, as some know. We got along great, when I drank a lot for a reason, with wake up, focus & mind opening things, as my brain steroid M.D. mentor ordered. Anyway, my profile, knowing more than you about IT, is why I asked both you & the President Juana Alonso about IT, to be faithful to my clients, which our “IT” guardian D.A. & A.G’s are on constructive notice about, as they are the reality of the law operation of constructive trusts. That said, how do you wish to proceed, contractually, in mature ay, given the attached rules +?
Respectfully,
08-15-07
By: IT
Dear Dwarf Alonso, Delcros & McBeans Arminta:
I was wondering if there is some reason, other than giving my shifts to other people, like Courtney, who need more shifts to pay their bills, that you put cut me from my shifts altogether.
Whenever I worked I always suggested that those who need a little extra cash to pay their rent & overhead go ahead & take some of my tables, because 3 shifts was plenty for me for now, as I have low overhead expenses. But it has been a couple weeks now & I haven’t even gotten called to work for anyone. Hilde asked me if I wanted to work for one day, but I never heard back from her to confirm that. Did you instruct Arminta, Michel, & Kari to tell no staff member to ask me to work for them?
Did you take me off being on call in addition to taking my shifts from me?
The reason that I am very stressed out right now is because I do have bills to pay & I just got another $1,544.00 bill to get my signals on my Car fixed, and I am one month behind in Car insurance.
I don’t know for sure, because I haven’t heard anything about it from anyone, but are you punishing me for doing what Michel suggest I do & write a book about our restaurant business?
Assuming you did terminate me with out saying anything, for writing a work manual consisting of real simple business rules, most of which I learned at Junior College, I would really appreciate your telling me that so that I can start mitigating your damages by looking for something else, perhaps at the Macaroni Grill where Christine’s brother works! Until I hear otherwise from you directly, I shall conclude you did not act in malice, retaliating against both me & P (a non-party) for 4th Amen, succinctly articulated & proficiently presented work rule papers. Next, do you have any idea why your partner (Michel’s roommate) wrote this verbatim bit to me:
I am going over to realty executives and complain to Polly’s broker about … her …and about you [writing about the restaurant business, which involves] … my ex-wife’s husband at work [who is he talking about?]. Did you even go to school [yes I did, I am a Juris Doctor], you pitiful fool? I had Michel read this rediculous note and he threw [his hands] up. You have nothing to loose. Your gal-pal DOES. I will contact the board as well. And, fool, my relatives are sick of … your ignorant rantings. Steven Corry
Was Steven acting on your behalf when he wrote this to me; that was very upsetting to both me & Polly, so you know. Why would anyone try to punish someone like that, Mr. President? I guess I inadvertently copied him & some others on our work group list, which I will make sure doesn’t happen again.
To clarify any confusion, yes I did go to school; I have a B.S., J.D. & extensive complex lit experience. See my CV, attached!
I have a detailed log of all communications made & copies of our Work Manual should you desire a copy!
09-13-07
By: IT
Condo-2 – Deed 1 Mo
Dwarf Juan Alonso – INDEX ED
4-Z Best – Punishment – EX – Termination For Me Writing, Nicely
Arminta’s Private Contract – “Ringing In Sales Tax Daily” Fiduciary Coffee Thing
President Accountability – Issue – How a prudent man in a position of trust acts
AD Wine Base – Real Simple Rules & Facts “to [respect] … [direct] cost … pricing….”
CEO – CV – Your Steven Corry said, “You have nothing to loose. Your gal-pal DOES.”
Gay Abuse @Work Stuff, Michel said, “When I hired you I thought you were gay.”
Ex Corry’s Cover’s – Michel’s – Kari’s Tip Embezzlement & Tax Evasion
Ex 4th Amen Corry said to P, “Get fu–ing Ready. Do you understand me – get ready.”
Ex 08-26-07 – 351 Embezzlement – “A”ffect the price (my income) in any manner … “person” shall include, but not be limited to, individuals [Corry, Frith, & Courtney]….
Ex 08-27-07 – Seniority – Courtney (early 20’s) gave up her property shifts to move to N.Y. to be a married mans’ party girlfriend, returning after IT didn’t work (C-Mano)
Ex 08-28-07 – Seniority – Good Samaritan American Statutes (Qualified)
Ex 08-29-07 – Schedule, Meeting & Agreement – Terminate Cash’s Nice Rule talk
Ex 08-29A-07 – Jody & Juan’s (JJ’s) $110 Big Screen gig – upping MD costs to US
Ex 08-31-07 – MD-Jody’s “Real Good At Math” Daily Wage Interest Embezzlement
Ex 09-01-07 – 1-3% Discrimination – VP list, without regard to Cost & fiat 15% paper
Ex 09-01A-07 – In-Humane – Pets Are Treated Better – “Fixing … [min wage slaves] … is illegal per se. [Under cost equals] … price maintenance was … struck down in Dr. Miles .… The fact that a state [man] authorizes the [under cost of living] price fixing does not, of course, give immunity to the scheme….
Labor Vessel – P-Guide
THE LOCK BOX COR(e)
Res Ipsa Loquitor, meaning, the liability thing speaks for itself.
“Freedoms of expression require “`breathing space.’” Philadelphia News, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 772 (1986). [B]reathing space is provided [but was xxx crossed here]….
Malicious Ex-Termination – average verdicts ranged from $452,5702 to $646,855.3”
“An employer must not, without reasonable or proper cause, conduct himself in a manner calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence between the employer and the employee.”
A tribunal may rule that an employee who resigns because of conduct by his or her employer has been ‘constructively dismissed’. For a tribunal to rule in this way the employer’s action has to be such that it can be regarded as a significant breach of the employment contract indicating that he or she intends no longer to be bound by one or more terms of the contract: an example of this might be where the employer arbitrarily demotes an employee to a lower rank or poorer paid position.
351 Manager Kar i – “You ordered Courtney away from me” Your pay stubs plus!
Lastly, because I don’t know for sure, so can you tell me my schedule for this week; I have bad insomnia & gum stress rashes not knowing; I owe big bills & I need & I want to work?
Tying Le Chen (e) – – JUST FACTS, THE PRESIDENT SAID, VERBATIM:
A) If you want to contract with me for my food, & if you want to enjoy wine with the food you contract with me for, then you must either:
a. Buy A Glass Or Bottle From ME/The boss (Agent); or
b. Pay Me/The Boss (Agent) $15.00 To Cork Your own bottle.
B) Now, we don’t charge anyone when they drink only the water with the food they contract for. I suppose some would think that is real good contract business if one could figure out a way to do that.
C) I decided to do that instead of respecting the real simple rule of all contracts, measure the cost of serving & set one price accordingly, which is not acute business acumen &, in house, is:
a. “[D]escribed as a “good source of [extra, free] revenue”-pursuant to a strategy of “maximizing … [revenue] income [calculating to skirt core contract rules].”
b. “It is based on a … measure reflecting customer’s [willingness] … to pay, which is totally unrelated to cost …, which … determine[s the] price.”
Juans’ Contract Capers Illustrated: “$ I pay Javier 7.50 to put chairs on the grass & you pay me” $450 for it.
Oh … forgot to tell you. I don’t pay my … manger [Kari] very much, so I slick … [her] … with 5% of the servants’ [tips] … as a peg Paula to pay Pablo perk.
Kitchen Crew Plus : Fired, in part, For this Thank you Card:
With your consent, I want to suggest to Juan that he consider a raise or bonus this year.
Jumel Trust: To artificially inflate his costs of doing business, with his Partner’s Jody & Arminta, Juan took out a $250,000 loan on the built in 1923 business property in 1995, which is public information if you know how to do PI work. He used a big chunk of that cash for personal use, not to fix, e.g., a decade old air conditioning unit in the banquet room.
Ex Intro Juan’s Court Knee:
IN-TRO FACTS
DIRECT PROOF
By contract, Juan, Arminta, Michel & Kari1 first orally offered Courtney my assigned property shifts, behind my back. C accepted that oral offer, promising, in return, to keep silent about their stealing server tips & erasing me, for valuable property shifts that she otherwise would not had access to. After being asked, C also agreed to pay J.A.M.-K. 5% of her event tips, like a strip club dancer.2 Upon securing C’s oral agreement, to insure she was on-board with the nefarious theft cover-up & plot to erase me agenda, J.A.M.-K. did as promised, giving C my shift property (in writing) behind my back, confirmed by back to back schedules, one with me mid-range in rank & my 3 shifts, the next drop-kicked to last place & cut 100%.
After seeing the schedule, scared, I asked master M, subserviently, am I am I being demoted to zero for doing the restaurant rule thing, like you asked?. M said to me, verbatim, “You are not being punished nor are you being let go, your just being put on call this week.”
It was a flat lie, by a series of Cartwright Code section 16720 (e) “obligations” to lie to me about it, to ignore me about it, & boycott me, by silent excommunication, about it. To be further sneaky about it, a couple weeks later when I came in for brunch on a Sunday, I was given the employee 25% discount by Sunny N, to make it seem as if I was merely put on call.
In concert, all SIX (Steve Corry) acted & accomplished their goal – to erase me by reducing my income thousands of dollars a month to zero in on shot, without a single word to me. They did so for property (money -C) & to maintain a standing combination of Code 351 theft plus.
Some undisputed & dated fact memos about IT are attached Direct Ev. Proof. Controlling rules about the named individuals’ personal liability for their intentional agenda to clip my sole source of income, rendering it an un-insurable charge, are all defined:
! For purposes of … [the rules] … [about acts by two or more people that "A"ffect the price (income) of another, … shall include ... individuals [like Courtney]….3
! Because the Cartwright Act (e) obligates are confirmed, the strip Cash acts are 16722 “absolutely void,” meaning there is no defense & Cash is owed money; &
! A C-JAM “injunction,” meaning my ordered rank back & a formal reinstatement.
Damages for the savages confirmed acts mandate every cent “of loss of income (price) I would have earned but for but for the animal like behavior of C-JAM-K, that’s what “treble” means. $6,000 per month is the black & white number on this single claim under the Cartwright Act, Cal. Business & Professions Code Section 16720 et sec. Naturally, garnishing (MAC’s checks) is an option. Each ring member is individually liable to me for all of it, plus my advocate for me hourly price (fee), using the sole legal price protocol, which I have produced: $300 per hour. I spend about 2-3+ hours on each pager; another element of mandated damages – always.
X-Box
About my customer & my clients hat, having bought rigged plates from Juan:
A) “In…competitive…price is equal to [direct] cost & each seller [boss Juan] knows his own cost.”
IN LIEU OF THAT, WITH BOB KESSLER’S APPROVAL
“[Mom & Pop Like Juan Sugar Schedule] Competitors … endeavor to secure information about each other with rival recon price check up teams?].”
B) Juan furnishes, on request, with his Sweetwater rivals, with the expectation of reciprocity, plate price lists, swapping to narrow ambit or match price, which is expressly banned business rigs. (XXX SOP)
C) “Knowledge of a competitor’s prices seemed to have the affect of keeping prices within a narrow ambit.”
A. And in the case of a simple price fixing cartel, they behave collectively on price [by checking others instead of minding their own gages]. They are fixing the price instead of having market [cost] forces generate the price.”
It Step Two
Bar’s Felony Bus Alliance Dunkel Boeckman Alonso Gator Aid LitA. W-a- that means … we … align our [plates et a with … that [Sweetwater & ptjer rivals] … ?? [Sweetwater] was the [core (e) or] biggest [in Agua Dulce area] … had the most products … that would … give … category managers good detail on the … retail report.
A. On a regular basis [we swap price data], yes. But we are always doing … comparisons to validate that being the right [price floor marc] … survey.
This is the conduct of men united in an agreement … to act together and pursue a common [anti-balance] purpose under a common [checkup] plan.
[W]ith direct evidence “the fact finder is not required to make inferences to establish facts.”
Ex The First Requisite
“The first requisite of civilization is … the assurance that a law once made will not be broken in favor of an individual or group….”
Diagnosis – Rules & Facts -
A) Dissocial Disorder (APD):
Antisocial personality disorder (APD) is a psychiatric condition characterized by an individual’s common disregard for social rules … and … codes, as well as impulsive ]firing] behavior, and indifference to the rights and feelings of others.
B) Sociopath:
Lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience. Sociopaths are interested only in their personal needs and desires, without concern for the effects of their behavior on others.
C) Narcisistic
Narcisistic patients try to sustain an image of perfection and personal invincibility.
Depression is common, as is chronic intense envy. Defensive self-delusion or lying to oneself by distorting the facts is common.
One diagnostic criteria for narcisistic personality disorder is characterized as a pervasive … lack of empathy. These individuals display … a pretentious … overestimation of abilities.
Our Patients – Dwarf Alfonso
Foreperson
DEBRA WONG YANG
“An employer must not, without reasonable or proper cause, conduct himself in a manner calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence between the employer and the employee.”
Dwarf Alfonso & Top Team Calculated to destroy the work family Trust:
CHORUS:
There is just one moon and one golden sun
And a smile means friendship to everyone.
Though the mountains divide
And the oceans are wide
It’s a small small world
Rule 11 (b) Representations to Court.
By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,–
(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;
(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law;
(3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and
(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence
c – Erin. Brokowitz
Dear Friends, I hope this free speech communication finds you well.
First, Dwarf AlfOnso has invited me & P, by his non-verbally saying that he has respected every single supreme rule on the books, to the T, to file, this week, with a check box negligence complaint, an updated version of the fax & law (criminal & civil) in both federal & state court plus, so you know.
Second, do you know my friend Ms. Remke & Mr. Bliech at the State Bar? I was just wondering. Anyway, as you invited me to do, I have already submitted my US files to my “boards plus,” which include the funny ones you opened the door to. As part of our ADR resolution, I quoted you (Juan/Steve/Michel), fronting these words of yours, verbatim:
A) I know where you live –itch;
B) Get ready. Get fu–ing Ready;
C) Do you understand me – get ready;
D) [Gash] … has nothing to loose. You- gal-pal DOES”
E) Yea, fuck off bitch;
F) Yea I called your office & [lied to them about you]”;
G) I told them that I am going to the board;
H) [I want you to S]uspend her by taking back her lock-box key.
I) I know that guy [Cash] is a looser. He is a looser….
J) [O]h, and FUCK OFF.
Third, Juan’s proxy, Steve Corry said, verbatim, all of the above to Ms. Polly, out of the blue, in addition to a whole lot more beyond nasty stuff that is just not appropriate to say here, in my view, all of which is logged, confirmed & submitted. Now, to be clear, all of this was in response to Juan & his management teams stealing Tips & my very nice work fact & rule memos, as dry & clean as can be, in furtherance of Juan & his teams white collar crimes, marked Juan Files A-Z. Polly’s attackers, Juan, Michel & Steve (Plus), crimes are confirmed on the attached CD.
Fourth, those nasty Juan, Steve, Kari, Michel, Arminta & Jody, all in accord, communication triggered a lot, including stress rashes, insominia, severe paranioa of the promised attack by Juan Alonso’s Steve Corry plus. One example is that Ms. P didn’t do an open house at her Crown Court Condo listing plus.
Do you have any thoughts on how We Shall Proceed, prior to my Westpoint De-briefing?
See attached Guardian submissions, for your information. So you know, Juan et al are flat money monkey savages, in my civilized, educated, law proficient D.C. view!
Again, We apologize for the filthy verbal attacks – We do not condone that bully potty mouth calculated by Dwarf Alfonso & Delcros (Corry’s “roomate”), after meeting with and paying off his thug Corry to act on their behalf (A combination of acts) – with free food & Gin & Tonics. IT is “R” is rated, but it is simply a factual reality presentation.
Eye Witnessed
Dwarf AlfOnso’s Felony “Trust” – Combination of acts by Delcros & Corry & Alf(E):
In Response, I said, verbatim, verified time & date, receipt confirmed:
Why did you tell P, ‘You Will Be Hearing From Me?’ Is there anything that I can do to be of any assistance for your all in any way?
Why did you say this to P, verbatim:
A) I am going over to realitive [stet] executives and complain to P’s broker …;
B) I will contact the board as well. And, fool, my relatives are…;
Juan, Kari, Michel, Arminta, Jody, & Steve specifically attacked Ms. Polly at her workplace, saying, verbatim:
A) [S]uspend her by taking back her lock-box key.
They attacked me this way, verbatim:
A) I believe this Mrs. Y has some criminal background for Tax evasion.
They attacked P repeatedly, saying, e.g., verbatim:
A) If I am not assured oby your vigilance, I will have to take it up with the California Board of Realitors.
The Condo’s Keys – on the table, then:
Why Can’t We All Just Get Along
To: daxurit@yahoo.com; revhilde2@aol.com
Cc: saphiria1972@aol.com
[Dwarf &] Michel: I received a couple really bizzare e-mails from Steven. I just read this one, attached below, & I have no idea what he is talking about, do you? I didn’t know It was Steven at first; I, not P, must have accidentally copied him & some others on our Rules & Work Book Manual! Are you feeling O.K.? If there is anything that I can do for you, just give me a call. God Bless You
cc: Hil D
Date: 01-29-08
Hi Ant Joanne:
As an introduction, it has been about three years since we had that lovely telephonic conversation We held, interviewing you, in your mock USA SS court. I personally thank you for insuring that was in Evidence before Mud. That helps a lot.
First, this is notice that I accept your invitation to challenging me to resolve your clumsy propaganda attack on me both informally & formally, for the record. Second, as part of my Belly Up State Bar application, here I mark just a dab of your confirmed lies in your Hustler article about me, under colors of authority, cementing my ‘83 action against you, among a litany of other actions:
My Ex 07-25-06 – Remke Thumb – There is no Conviction, you lied big – thanks:
A) Rule of Crim. Pro. 11 (e)(1): the court [Joanne Remke, Mud– 10th Ame Deserters] SHALL NOT participate in any “plea-contract” discussions.[1]
B) Thank you for confessing that you hate Article 6 “all state law to the contrary} like yours, felony acted on, aka, “notwithstanding.”
C) Thank you for confessing to being an Article 3 Standing Traitor!
My Ex Remke’s Political Propoganda Article, lying about facts, verbatim:
A) 300 & 1,000 [freeh speech calls] … phone calls to at least 11 law firms
B) Thank you for confirming your 1st Amen Skipping, which = Treason
C) During a two-month period in 2001;
D) One of his targets was high-profile class action king William Lerach;
E) Another … was an attorney who [felony] defended one … supermarkets; he received at least 143 phone calls and scores of e-mails from Y—‘;
My Ex 01-25-08 WIC Clippers – Your Felony WIC/Poverty Agenda Harboring
My Ex You charge Felony Late Fees for so called “Bar Due Tithes” – Proof
My Ex Your Felony Suppression of Evidence Facts & Rules Your Tort Duty
My Ex 01-28-07 – Len Simon Tapped 2000 – You = WIC Rig Accessory
Third, thank you for hiding & harboring the facts I personally presented to your team in ’04 about the confessed WIC economic treason endorsed by you & your partner, Jeff Bliech, who, in turn, is partners with Greg Stone, who, in turn, is partners with David Noonan, who, in turn, is now confessed partners with Dirty boy Dan Mogin.
Fourth, you have nothing but gossip & lies, context void, which you chose to subvert, perniciously. That reality is because We blue printed IT all that way.
Fifth, you like games, We know. Owing to that reality, you may go fetch a copy of the full files (on CD) from some We informally filed with, see attached. Good luck Up Chuck M.!
E. B.
P.S. [Dwarf, Michel &] Steve Corry, I accept your invitation to a formal OWED DUE PROCESS presentation & have already submitted IT about YOU to them, which you are welcome to respond to before I D-Fault & garnish your income, which you TAX EVADE FROM, which Michel Delcros harbors on your behalf, like he does Juan’s host of crimes, including 351 Felonies, which you chose to be an accessory in fact in.
My Way
Court Is In Session
Get Smart
‘99