Date: 04-19-08
Greetings Mr. C I-Con & Team:
This is part B of my direct proposal presentation. With Part A in mind, this follows:
First, as you are no doubt aware, generally A.G./D.O.J. addresses concerns in part, leaving main monetary resolution to the private sector, which is what the very top Complex Lit Class Action “invest in” and “capitalize on.” There is a long list of examples, but the Nasdaq price fixing case serves as a “middle of the road” example.
In Nasdaq the public authorities did file & address “injunctive” like changes to address certain market maker missteps. The private sector squared up that EZ case for 1.27 billion dollars cash and about $140 million in attorneys’ fees. Unfortunately (or fortunately for us), the lead plaintiff’s counsel in that case (Chris Lovell, Mel Weiss, Bill Lerach & Michael Hausfeld & Kaplan) weren’t exactly honest with the court from a defined world of marked factual angles:
Ex 06-06-06 – All Major Case Lead Counsel’s Contempt of Pro Rata Attorney Fee Order
You might know Professor’s Christie & Shultz, whose one article triggered the wave of filings in that “sure thing” case, which complex lit reality lead counsel were less than candid about when asking for their big multiplier over their inflated hourly rates in that case. On that note, about Complex Class Lead Counsel’s law not “acute” law games, I quote from the esteemed Dr. Ken Elzinga, verbatim:
A. [Complex Lit Lead Counsel C]artels ‑‑ the German expression is a “Cartel‑meister,” the master of the cartel, person who organizes it, runs it operates it, sort of the genius behind the cartel, the person that consumers should dislike very much.[1] Ken Elzinga under oath, on trial, page 3940:15-25.
Second, so you know, owing to the current “contract” climate, my offer comes with the attached triple “immunity shield” & “Grandfather clause” for the “invited only:
Ex Immunity Clause
Ex Grandfather Clause
Ex The Law Of One Flag
Ex Loss Of Citizenship – Rules “The United States [UCC] government is a foreign corporation….”[2] - By Contract – EZ Class Action
Last, If you’d like to arrange a meeting to discuss this matter, I am available on Monday! My private, unlisted number is 999-999-078 . God Bless America!
Sincerely,
Alpha Solutions – Treason Cause Of Action Retro-Fitted
As a brief introduction, I remind ALL about what TREASON is, which is a very flexible reality, straight by the book:
In law, treason is the crime of disloyalty to one nation’s (business) law. A person who betrays the single nation of their citizenship and/or reneges on an oath of (business) loyalty and in some way willfully cooperates with an enemy, is considered to be a (business) traitor.
A) The betrayal of a (business) trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery;
B) A (business) crime that undermines the offender’s government;
C) Disloyalty by virtue of subversive (business) behavior; or
D) An act of deliberate (partner, fiduciary & work-staff) betrayal, e.g.
Here, there are lots of supremely universal “common business laws” that a defined world of mortals openly defy, saying, by oral & non-verbal communications & acts, which speak truth, many have openly said they owes no allegiance simple rules. They play the odds calculating that they will not get caught & be taken to the law box, in part owing to “short bus” egos & in part owing to subversive political business connections. For example, enclosed marks disloyalty to rules, which translates into respect, from a defined world of reality applications, all of which are confirmed: Tax Treason, Billing Treason, In-testate succession treason, partnership treason, “colors of authority treason & more. One small example, which I front, is a not nice “boss man” named Juan Alonso who has been doing business in Acton California for almost 30 years, skimming tips from struggling single mothers to grease his “preferred” staff & so he can pay less & pocket more for not working. He does so in corrupt violation of, e.g.:
Labor Code Section 351: [My] Tip[s] … cannot be used to compensate the owner(s), manager(s), or supervisor(s) of the business, even if these individuals should provide direct table service to a patron.
Openly defying a rule is one thing, the collateral actions taken to cover it opens the door to another realm of wicked behaviors, like terminating one for peacefully raising it & related tax concerns & simple tax rules, all of which are governed, in court by:
A test demanding respect to rules that “a prudent man in a position of trust would observe.”
The identified persons marked on the enclosed CD & identified crimes are white collar ranging from small to jumbo, including “false tax write off” treason (Brad O’Husky) to under reporting on a macro scale by way of false “invoice cost claims, i.e., “Sugar Case “Concession” – on Hall Mark cards – laundering tens of millions annually. See enclosed “CD” containing the facts, verified. (10th Amen & Sherman Act Contracts.
IT Link:
https://cid-77d0ff7ab3786013.skydrive.live.com/home.aspx
Ex C-4 – Both Leads Agree In Fact Not To Disclose Rules – How IT Works
A. By Buck, Ms.: As I mentioned before, your honor, … these are all [Niche class partner script contractors]….
A. By Buck, Ms.: Mr. [joint defense partners] … indicated that was the standard [combination of acts] practice, that they would have to, before any settlement offer was reached on that case, that all three would have to agree, meaning the [partner] representatives of … [Visa CEO].
Standard Court “Combination of Acts”
By Two Or More Rival Partner Adversaries
A. THE COURT: let me see if I understand this correctly. It got started as an alleged [communication] … is that correct?
A. Ms. Buck: Yes.
Q. Looking at people’s … 2, is this another [communication] … that was forwarded from …to Greg Stone [‘s partnership, for example], who then in turn forwarded it to other attorneys, including [Arnold & Porter’s partner team, for example] …?
A. Yes, that is correct.
A. By Buck, Ms.: [All of it is about confessed] talks about, again, the case & settlement [and what to & not to disclose, law & fact wise].
A. By Buck, Ms.: So the whole theme of the entire [speech communication] … is again to, you know, try to extract … a settlement [after each team has billed enough hours to it to pan off to the court]….
A. By Buck, Ms.: So, again, when you look at the totality of all the calls & the background of the case, you realize that this is the bottom line or underlying incentive for [Niche counselors] ….
“Any way that they [lead counsel] communicate [about what not to disclose to the court, in pleadings & in settlement contracts] … if it is a form of communication that leads to a restriction in [price equals cost universal] competition [rules, in the settlement context], it is illegal.” Elzinga TT 4122:
Law Of Averages & Reserves
You Are Guaranteed To Get Jacked, Overall
A Ponzie Op & All Of The Bells & J.P. Morgan Whistles, on an unprecedented & ultra sophisticated level:
A) “[U]nits … of … stock [paper] and [ink & gum flapping] debentures.”
B) “Some 621,000 shares were thus to be offered in units, each consisting of three shares of common and a 0 debenture, in return for 1 cash.”
C) [T]hey conspired to [before selling] … the units by including substantially [or “materially”] misleading [words & omissions, A-Z] …. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, 726 (1975).
…
Q: You supplied 600 units at $43 each?
A: That’s right.
A: [I] … could have sold [IT] at any price. …I could have sold [IT] at any price. … I figured $43 was enough…. The Wall Street Jungle, by Richard Ney, page 19-20.
“It is based on a … measure reflecting customer’s ability to pay [based on words & numbers on paper, not “cash in the bank”], which is totally unrelated to cost … which should determine price.” BMI, 441 U.S. 1, 31 (Stevens’ Dissent revived).
It Is Always Set Up To Keep Artificial Revenues Flowing & Laundered
To Move Units Of Fiction, Which Cannot Be Cashed Out at a 25% Margin Like Call
The price of units of a thing called stock, which is highly unstable & can not even be “withdrawn” in a 25% block move because they are all artificial numbers, directly causes people to commit suicide, leaves people homeless, penniless, fluctuates daily, is not by price right protocol & is not steered by anything remotely “faithful” to contracts.
It is a taboo topic – taboo to litigate, taboo to write about, taboo to talk about. If you think IT might have something to do with John F. Kennedy (& A.G. Bobbie), you might want to read my fact-backed chapter on that. They exposed, in print, exactly HOW the price of a unit of nothing called stock is rigged daily – a bit of their S.E.C. sting proof:
Shifting, about the “consumer” class of energy users who overpaid for energy, which group action Pat promised not to bring on behalf of Us, by agreement with Defense Leads, for which fraudulent concealment is sealed. See, e.g., Illinois 2005 “bilking real consumers who need energy to live in the ICE cold in the winter, unlike a maybe savings account.
“One cannot make the dilemma go away by observing that a seller can obtain all of the information that he wants about the prices of his competitors by asking his customers, or theirs, about those prices.” Posner, Antitrust Law, An Economic Perspective, Ch 7, at 133, 136 (University of Chicago Press, 1976).
To clarify, a bit, a devilishly cast Lerach Remke Kendrick Brewer Mogin Record:
03-09-2004 (D. A.X. File)
Clerks Transcript On Appeal, Volume 1 of 3, bate stamp number 0010, verbatim:
Count 3
In the summer of 2000, Mr. Bonas approached Mr. Mogin asking for help (lie) in a dispute with Mr. Kendrick. Mr. Mogin referred Mr. Bonas to another attorney [Robert Brewer, who wanted to hide his name from the record, like a coward, like when breached the attorney client privilege, multiple times over aiding & abetting flat double jeopardy treason.].
Cash Bonas was also contacting the office on a regular basis because he needed help (lie) on his … appeal (lie). Mr. Mogin stated, “in the beginning, Bonas was quirky (lie), but normal. In the course of dealing with him, I realized he had gotten progressively flakier [lie]. [Flakier on what is omitted, I wasn’t working for Danny. I was debriefing him on the nuts & bolts of “IT”.]
After a falling out with the attorney [Robert Brewer, of Mckenna Long & Aldridge] Mr. Mogin had referred him to, Mr.Bonas stopped calling Mr. Mogin. This attorney [Robert Brewer] stated the falling out was over defendant’s increasingly bizarre behavior [lie] and his failure to pay money owed [lie] to the firm for legal services [lie – It had straight to do with malpractice, harboring open & shut felony tying & price fixing & Brewers void hourly price & billing rig] .
For iron context, I reference my “Jay” file, cementing Bob & Mogin’s lies, verbatim:
A) “Mr. Bonas arrived unannounced [lie] once (true)”;
B) “[H]e was dirty [lie] unkept [lie]”;
C) “To mess with me is one thing, to bring my family [lie] into it is another”. [See exactly what I said - “Lucky’s Parent Company.”]
Wth regard to “A” I did not arrive unannounced on February 27, 2001. Check the tapes. One of the series of legal speech I pressed at work only and about work only, I told these fine gentlemen that I would be in San Diego & would be stopping by to collect the back pay flake Mogin lied about, by omission & to secure the $5,000 his anti-protocol partner Brewer still owes me for flaking & malpractice & harboring IT, as an opener.
Double Jeopardy Cemented
Replaying exactly the same law speech plucks, felony “re-examined” after being forever banned from being looked at, across the board, the legally incompetent “investigator” full court failed his line of duty by, e.g.:
A) Never once asked to “interview” me, for clarification, by pact;
B) Never once took any of the law information presented to an unbiased law profession, by agreement. Way over the line, the one sidedness seals it.
About the State Trooper Law man Sanders’ corrupt “investigation,” next!
https://cid-77d0ff7ab3786013.skydrive.live.com/home.aspx
The Walter Affair Series:
Date: 04-18-08
Greetings Honorable Justice Walter & Clerks:
This is a short follow to my prior sub-missions, which I again submit pursuant to my 1st Amendment under the defined Jurisdiction under Law of The Flag – the one that our military flies, the one without the gold fringe, as a first class citizen of the United Republic only.
First, as a brief introduction, I present the attached & dated short one-pagers:
Ex 04-08-08 – Thank You For Honoring America, Judicial Integrity & The Oath Of Office
Second, with regard to the Lerach matter, I absolutely agree with your honorable statements relating to this & other matters, verbatim:
“This whole conspiracy corrupted the law firm[s – defense] and it corrupted it in the most evil way,” said U.S. District Judge John Walter
“The conduct to me just goes to the core of the judicial system,” Walter said.
“In the court’s view, [the mis] conduct is one of the most serious crimes to come before this court,” Walter said. “The scope and duration … was breathtaking.”
The lack of respect for [America’s] … court amounted to the “absolute height of arrogance,” the judge said.
Third, as a public disclosure previously un-disclosed, I have attached a short one pager outlining the three general classes of citizens & the different bodies of law that apply to second & third classes citizens:
Ex The Scope Of Jurisdiction Of The 3D Flags’ Law Bodies – Privileges/Immunities Clause
On a final note, I think about what others think about the entire field of securities litigation’s existence owing to A.G. not enforcing the “equal consideration” element in contracts & the definition of competition (price equals cost), which is all nations law, e.g., as charged. Indeed, some may view Mr. Lerach as having done A.G.’s job to the best of his ability over the past decades owing to A.G. (T. Barnett) dropping the ball. Nonetheless, I agree with you, Honorable justice Walter, paraphrased, “that everyone does IT is no defense.” I thank you for reminding Us of that reality.
Respectfully Submitted,
Walter Scandal Series 2
Re: A.G.’s Secret – Kick Back Felonies & Fall Guy Lerach
Date: 02-07-08
This is a short presentation to assist in a more informed sentencing (or even entertaining it) relating to Mr. Bill Lerach. The parties have been courtesy copied, return receipt, by U.S. Postal Road e-mail surveillance plus, for clarification. Sadly, this is a case of calling the kettle black owing to our A.G., Inc.’s felony suppression & harboring of mammoth executive kick-back felonies by A.G. Ronald Chengs’ team, all in accord, including Yang, Russi, Barbara Masterson & Dan Barrios, for their executive ghost clients.
First, I remind this honorable court about our submission about “IT,” receipt confirmed:
Ex 11-27-07 – A.G. is advancing Wall Street Ponzi Schemes
A) Here, the creed statute’s PLAIN LANGUAGE is CONCLUSIVE.
B) This is too extravagant to be maintained.
C) The intelligence contained on the enclosed CD is for your info [Judge Walter]!
Second, We understand that sometimes our guardians need reminders about what they may & may not do, which dovetails into our system of check & balance, which the following adds to, for clarification. Here, We shift to A.G. Cheng’s team’s kick-back crimes & their media campaign, backed by the State Bar, to cover those crimes by engaging, under colors of authority, our We The People guardian, Mr. Lerach:
NO HARM NO FOWL
The key tangible harm falsely claimed by A.G. here is that identified Wall Street Executives were Mr. Lerach’s We The People clients after they manipulated the face value of their own currency downward (Article 1 Coin) that they contracted to sell to We sold to We The People. That is the root of the cancer here, not Bill Lerach playing the cards your U.C.C. all capitalized name people chattel trafficking legislatures dealt him. Judicial notice shall be taken of that truism.
ON THE REALITY OF MY
A.G. CLIENTS’ KICKBACKS
It is the nature of an A.G. sociopath to project accusations of what A.G. is onto another, to divert the reality of it’s misdeeds as a plotted media play campaign. That, We submit, is what is going on here. It is a confirmed fact that A.G., all in accord, has felony suppressed deep executive kick-back facts on behalf of its executive clients, cementing its own harboring, aiding & abetting & accessory realities. Indeed, the very indictment allegations A.G. slung at Mr. Lerach are easily converted into one against A.G., with verified facts; A.G. has perniciously turned the tables, wickedly, to shelter itself.
WHAT DISGORGEMENT &
WHAT ILL-GOTTEN GAINS
Kick-Back Facts
First, so we are speaking the same language, the term kickback is a synonym for felony “concessions” as defined in Sugar. Here, We present some short, sworn to under oath, CEO kick-back facts, all of which A.G. has been on actual notice of since 2001:
Q. When you first took over responsibility for [your staple items]…, were there any rebates [off invoice kickbacks]?
A. No.
Q. Did there come a time when there started to be rebates [called kick-backs]?
A. Yes.
1985 – 1988
Q. First … are they taken into account in computing the … margin [10K-10Q]?
A. No.
Q. What is the largest amount of one you can recall?
A. [I]n excess of $24,000,000 (from Hallmark).
…
A. If I, if I … I … keep that money…. [stick one]!
…
A. We use some of it to put it against our gross margins to smooth out [artificially] our gross [revenue reporting 10K-10Q] so that we were on a consistent reporting basis – so on a quarterly basis we were able to achieve whatever we wanted to report.
Q. So … the [invoice] price … went up when you had [bad Sugar] slotting?
A. Absolutely.
A. So by taking those monies and setting them aside in a [shush] fund….
A. That’s how the rebate program got started and continued.
A. And now I have … rebates and … could do something really exciting.
A. [Executives stumbled, confessing] If I, if I … I … keep that money….
A. [W]e … put that money up in a holding account with our accounting department ….
A. Let’s say for an example that we were having a relatively good period & we did not need that money to achieve our gross margin for that period, & we knew that the next month we were going to have a pretty difficult time meeting revenue forecasts.
A. We would put that money up in a holding account with our accounting department, & they would hold it until the next period. We use some of it to put it against our gross margins to smooth out our gross so that we were on a consistent reporting basis – so on a quarterly basis we were able to achieve whatever we wanted to report.
…
Q. … without giving specifics of any of these other contracts, what types…of commodities or products have been involved?
A. Greeting cards, light bulbs, pasta, dry beans, rice, private label products, numerous…items across the store.
Shifting, to translate a bit, the felony kickback facts marked above were specifically discussed & expressly banned in 1936, verbatim supreme:
[T]he [Major Crime Unit] practice [of pawning off invoice numbers as one’s real cost] developed on the part of some, but not all, [sellers] … of giving secret concessions [off invoice money for the account].
There were some…who never indulged in that practice, but others, called [& confirmed] ‘unethical’ … did so to such an extent that …all…[stuff] sold …carried secret [kick-back] … of some kind.
[Some book keepers, for example,] … falsely represent— [invoice] prices [to clients, the IRS, & on S.E.C. filings, for example] which they said they … procure[d] & actually paid] from [franchise]… sellers.’”
A.G. CHENG’S MAJOR CRIME SPREE – USURPING
Now, A.G. sociopath Ronald Cheng’s team has been on actual notice of the above crimes since & before 2001. Doing just the opposite of what We pay A.G. to do, A.G. Cheng has usurped his position by agreeing, in & out house:
A) To harbor the above crimes for Wall Street; &
B) To turn the tables & attack Mr. Lerach for it.
To be very clear, know that Mr. Lerach too has known about the above major crimes since at least 2001. Mr. Lerach, however, is not charged with the duty to cure it, like your A.G. Cheng is. Maybe Mr. Lerach did use his knowledge of the above major white collar crimes to leverage better settlements on behalf of We The People, who roundly get jacked by the fiat money the executives you’re A.G. identified in your indictment against Mr. Lerach.
So you know, Mr. Lerach & the other major We The People guardians you’re corrupt A.G. has attacked are not the only ones privy to this felony intelligence nor are they the only ones who compensate clients for stepping up to address riddled with corruption fiat money manipulation. Mr. Lerach & Lazar, e.g., have simply been targeted for tarring by your A.G., representing their identified executive clients, which, We submit, is out of order. A.G. bringing it in the first place is corrupt, knowing the above facts. That an honorable court has endorsed this venal action, by entertaining it from go, is a symptom, in our view, of a deeply infected by Wall Street Court Cancer. Is this honorable court a holder of any stock is a critical inquiry on the appeal We shall make, our way, if necessary!
Sadly, it is crystal clear that both A.G. & this court, in concert, are executing a broad message to the We The People plaintiff’s bar to back off filing cases to address a riddled with corruption Wall Street? As an example, perhaps this honorable court would like to explain to US how Mr. Richard Grasso came up on a roughly 200 million severance package from the EX-CHANGE? Simple theft is one reality. That known, We cite Jefferson:
“To unequal privileges among members of the same society the spirit of our nation is, with one accord, adverse.”
About citing Jefferson, common law & the rule book, our Articles, for clarification, We understand that in your court citing our founders (whom I am surely no wiser than) is not permitted by your smoke filled Ivy room agenda, under colors of authority. Our thought on that, however, is that you, not I, will have a grand difficulty explaining that, formally, if necessary, at an impeachment hearing for very bad behavior & public fraud, under colors of authority.
Next, the legal reality of which judicial notice is taken is that this is not your court: it is a We The People common law only court, to remind you. And it is not from you that “We the free” derive & invoke our bourn rights:
“A free people [claim] their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate.”
“That liberty [is pure] which is to go to all, and not to the few or the rich alone.”
SOME ME & IT BACKGROUND
Curse of Cane
As I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I shall fear no evil. For my staff & my rod, they comfort me. Psalms 23
About the above kick-back felonies, Mr. Mogin too has been on actual notice of them as I personally presented them to him in 2000 & in 2001, which triggered his joining hands with Mr. Noonan/Greg Stone to have me kidnapped & double prosecuted, in concert with Ronald Cheng, to suppress the disclosure of that sensitive, public Niche Field Felony information.
Shifting, one of the methods of leveraging the facts & rules pertaining to the niche field involves coupon settlements, in lieu of owed hard cash. Here is a quote, from Freeman v. Shack marking one sample of the back door deal making “contract settlement agreement in restraint of trade” entered by some, not all, fiduciary class guardians, verbatim:
In May 2004, Freeman, Schack, Barry, and Mogin participated in a mediation planning session in Los Angeles. At the mediation, Schack and Mogin began proposing that Freeman II should be settled for coupons to the class members valued at approximately $30 or less.
Last, I again remind of the nature of a sociopath, like Joanne Remke, whose team has been on actual notice of the above major kick-back crimes since 2004. In an overt act of rebellion against this directive, verbatim:
A lawyer will not be subject to retrial on … charges of threatening … counsel….
To parrot the sociopath herself, right back at her, she wrote, verbatim:
There are [no] … mitigating circumstances [for any of the players involved].
In a fraud opinion stacked with lies & deceit, here I present one flat lie Remke flat lie deception, without citing a signle fact, sadly sponsored by who prtends to be a semi competent judge, verbatim:
Respondent made threatening references to Mogin’s family.
Ms. Remke knows full well what the facts are, verbatim I said:
CASE BABIES & COMPANY FAMILY VERBAGE
A) Congratulations, I hear you are a Lucky [Stores] parent [American Stores];
B) Ever need help [case] baby sitting …; &
C) Before asking me … ask the king [pin] man, Elliot Disner.
See, unlike Ms. Remke, a real Judge (ME) cites facts, to the record, instead of citing herself or parroting poison replayed, like a broken record, regurgitating cud, not facts, felony “re-examined” by the entire STD San Diego Bench by seditious DA-AG’s kidnapping & court attacks on me & my character. About Joanne Remke et al the players involved, this one needle of chronic fraud by Remke fits like a glove pertaining to her own arrogantly bold gamble, verbatim:
[My] … Court concludes that the facts and circumstances surrounding [Remke – Mogin et als] … commission of the [harboring, suppressing, libel, slander plus] offenses for which [plenty are on actual notice of & have been unmasked & convicted by peers] … involved moral turpitude. “Moral turpitude” has been defined by the California Supreme Court as ~’an act of baseness, vileness or depravity in the private and social duties which a man [and Remke] owes to his fellowmen, or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between man and man.” (In re Craig (1938) 12 Cal.2d 93, 97.) Holding that an attorney’s act constitutes moral turpitude characterizes the attorney as unsuitable to practice law. (In re Strick (1983) 34 Cal.3d 891,902; In re Higbie (1972) 6 Cal.3d 562, 570.)
Significantly, notice there are no verifications nor a single fact cited footnote in Remke’s Hustle article about me. That reality is because there are no facts & the facts she cites are open lies by sociopath guilty law hookers to cover their own crimes, harboring & leveraging felony facts for big money class action settlements – Anti-trust & securities. We thank Remke’s clan very much for confirming her lack of judicial integrity cemented by her own Hustler lies, research & Hustler publication (s), which we shall come back to for further clarification, Countrywide.
Next if you think I didn’t check myself into protective custody given the mammoth crimes involved, on cue, as directed, after Greg Stone threatened the lives of my family, you are sorely mistaken! I joke you not, those remotely familiar with My field know full well that defense bar boys, like Greg Stone, are flat corporate mafia advocates, proficient in the art of linguistic & illegal deceit, like their clumsy advocate Remke!
CEO Burd – Remke’s client, unmasked
CEO Johnson – Remke’s client, unmasked
CEO David Dillon _ Remke’s client, unmasked
STRAIGHT BY THE ONE RULE BOOK
Article 1, section 3 reads, verbatim:
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to [common] Law.
Article 3, Section 1 reads, verbatim:
The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court [which is not California’s], and in such inferior Courts [which is not Remke’s or Robert Trentacosta’s] as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour….
Article 1, Section 6 reads, verbatim:
The … Representatives [meaning judges, D.A.- A.G.] …. They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest….
Article 2, Section 4 reads, verbatim:
[A]ll civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Article 3, Section 3 reads, verbatim:
No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
One count of Remke treason with regard to me, e.g., is the fact that she, and others, refused to give any faith, any credit to the public record of my federal state order of dismissal, with prejudice in 2003:
Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. Article 4, Section 1.
CHENG A.G. & REMKE’S BAR SPONSORS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY
SUBERSIVE COURT HUNTS & LIBEL CAMPAIGNS, INVADING US
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence. Article 4, Section 4.
Again, the cannon the court owes duty to reads:
[The] … plain language is conclusive.
Now, “I may err in my measures, but never shall [I] deflect from the intention to fortify the public liberty by every possible [lawful] means, and to put it out of the power of the few to riot on the labors of the many.”
Next, supreme dicta ON MY RULE WORD “NO” reads:
“[A] function of free (e) speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger.”
“Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have profound unsettling effects as it presses for acceptance of an idea. “
“That is why freedom of speech . . . is . . . protected against censorship or punishment, unless shown likely to produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest. . . .”
There is no room under our Constitution for a more restrictive view. For the alternative would lead to standardization of ideas either by legislatures [Harrassing Toilet paper], courts, or dominant political [Esquire] or community [Dunk] groups.”
EX-US MAGAZINE – ON CUE QUOTES
“[Sugar Schedule Cartel’s are] … vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labor, and lives the more, the more labor it sucks.”
The above known, We suggest the following options:
A) Dismiss IT, with prejudice;
B) Continue IT & think about IT, wisely; &/or
C) Other info & options are on the enclosed CD.
On a final note, did you know that my mother had a double liver & kidney transplant in the middle of my ‘99 Agent double planted “Yoke/Caviar” case? On the white cross, on my mother & father’s grave, I share this now.
Godspeed & in hoc signo vinces my brother Walter!
State Bar Worts
Joanne Remke’s State Bar’s political and lobbying activities, combined with the fraud by omission compulsory nature of its dues, have already resulted in a U.S. Supreme Court case in which Joanne Remke (the State Bar) was forced to allow attorneys to opt out of paying dues to support positions which they know are abhorrent to the pledge. Keller v. State Bar of California, 496 U.S. 1 (1990). This application shall detail exactly why I, in 1975, through my D.C. Supreme court in D.C., said, verbatim:
“`The lawyers have slowly, but surely, been committing economic suicide as a [big bank business] profession.’” GOLDFARB v. VIRGINIA STATE BAR, 421 U.S. 773 Footnote 16 (1975).
Joanne’s State Bar company, without a client, without standing, for the third bite (double & triple jeopardy clause command), representing no one but herself & her & he own confirmed monopoly lock on her& her clients diamond mine, R.I.C.O. syndication of class action law suit ring, with no respect to a single thing America holds sacred, stole this birth right of mine:
It is a manifest encroachment on workers liberty (9th Ame), & of those who might be disposed to employ me. Adam Smith, Wealth Of Nat’s (1776).
One of Joanne’s client partners, in accusing me, has already confessed to obstructing justice & lying to the authorities about some of the many White Shoe Crimes Bar crimes I raised directly with Joanne Remke’s Bar in the past 6 years, which Joanne has, by agreement, been harboring since, by both failing to act in the wake of her duty to act & by waging a creative writing libel campaign against me for addressing IT, on her clients in fact behalf.
Undeniably, for her White Shoe clients, Ms. Remke rolled the dice, calculating to skip all of the duties owed, under false color of authority:
“When [bar barristers] seek to deprive one of the right to practice law, they must accord the same rights as taking any other private property.” Law Students Civil Rights Research Council v. Wadmond, 401 U.S. 154 (1971).
A terrorist not Judge, pretending to be – Sloan’s Remke – a confirmed SS# defector, backing SS# desertion, including this confirmed DA SS State Troop, Inc fact situation:
Interview Of The District Attorney’s Anti-Compliance
Today is June 3, 2008. I phoned the S-CV District Attorneys Juvenile Division today at 3:30 PM and spoke with the clerk about my son’s abduction & being assaulted with a lethal weapon. The clerk transferred me to Nora Hernandez who was helpful, patient and informative. This is a paraphrased verbatim summary:
I quickly introduced myself to Nora and gave her a quick review of my first hand experience in trying to procure my son’s arrest report. Nora was very helpful and cooperative. She checked her database for the report and found nothing. She said that it is likely that the District Attorney’s office has not yet received the report and that is why it is not in her database. She also said, verbatim:
“Reports come from the court not the DA [Inc].”
“They have 10 days before the hearing date to submit the file.”
“They sometime get the report at the court date.”
“They don’t give reports to parents of minors, only attorney’s representing them.”
“It is against the law [lie] for them to provide the parents with the reports.”
I told Nora about the incident on May 21, 2008 when my son Brennan Bernardino was assaulted with a lethal weapon, kidnapped & terrorized by a local terrorist neighbor (who turned out to be an off duty officer) who held a gun to his head and initiated a false arrest against & planted false evidence for show against my son, according to the declarations to date. I asked Nora if I could submit my investigation & our declarations to the District Attorney prior to the court date. Nora told me No, verbatim:
“Charges may not be filed against your son.”
“It is up to the District Attorney’s office and there is nothing in their data yet.”
“No you can’t give us your research because that is not how it is done.”
I thanked Nora for her time. I let her know that I intend to get that report before the hearing regardless if they are to file charges or not. I debriefed her again on the incident and let her know that is not possible for the District Attorney to make remotely competent indictment evaluation on whether to charge or not when his decision is based a defective, undisclosed “one sided” polemics argument. My son’s declaration is not part of the DA’s file and the owner of the vehicle is not pressing charges, so the only crime committed would be the crime against my son, which you abuse your duty to act on by failing to investigate that aspect of this deliberate indifference hate crime.
Nora explained to me that generally, the tickets are given and the District Attorneys office reviews the cases as they come in. The cases should come in at least 10 days before the court date but sometimes they don’t. Sometimes they come in on the court date. When you get to court, the judge lets you know if they have decided to move forward or if they decide to drop the charges.
I swear under penalty of perjury the facts presented are paraphrased true.
June 3, 2008 By ___________________________
P