Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!
This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008 at 7:30 am and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can feed this entry.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses
On Trust
“IT” Code
The Home Run
The Cartwright Act Elements
The Cartwright Act is California’s antitrust statute. “Maintaining completely free and open competition so that “the public may receive better goods and [complex lit] services at a lower cost” is purpose of the Cartwright Act. Federal Sherman Act cases are instructive on Cartwright Act problems. Unlike the Cartwright Act, however, the plain language of the Sherman Act, does not instruct as to its analytical framework. Sections 16722 and 16725 establish the per se rule of illegality and a case-by-case analysis of a combination’s “purpose” and “effect.
The antitrust laws were designed to be a comprehensive charter of economic liberty aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade. It rests on the premise that the unrestrained interaction of competitive forces will yield the best allocation of our economic resources, the lowest prices, the highest quality and the greatest material progress, while at the same time providing an environment conducive to the preservation of our democratic political and social institutions. But even were that premise open to question, the policy unequivocally laid down by the Act is competition. In the vindication of this policy any combination which tampers with the price structure is unlawful.1 The Cartwright Act makes unlawful all “trusts,” defined as “a combination of capital, skill or acts by two or more persons [in and/or out house] for any of the following purposes: (a) to create or carry out restrictions in [any] trade or commerce…. (e) To make or enter into or execute or carry out any contracts, obligations or agreements of any kind or description, by which they [a]gree to pool, combine, or directly or indirectly unite any interests that they may have connected with the sale…of any…[Complex lit legal service to the court] commodity, that its price might in any manner be affected. (Emphasis).
Contracts or agreements in violation of the Act’s provisions are “void and unenforceable” and subject to injunction and civil actions for damages.
Contained in our posted “IT” files are inside details from marked surveys fitting every one of the elements of the prima facie felony “Trust” action:
Len Simon Mel & Pat’s Enron So
Called Document [Box] Clerks Hourly Rig
$165 to $210 per hour X 8,346.20 hours = $1,619,368.25
Mel & Pat have cemented their attempt before the honorable Justice Harmon to secure for themselves that 1.6 million times five, under oath, with zero supporting documents of any explanation for mammoth over 8 million dollars. That’s a micro bit:
$194 per hour for loading, transporting, unloading documents – Milberg & Coughlin’s hourly sticker price tag is more than most attorneys. But PC & Mel want that times five, aka, $970 per hour – My Pro Esquire rate is 3.333 (PI) of that.
“Criminal Arrogance” – B., Max Coughlin – Weiss’
But he [Judge Walter] said he was troubled about Weiss’ conduct during a November 2003 meeting at which kickback payments were discussed with a lawyer for one of the lead plaintiffs, Howard Vogel. In court papers, prosecutors had said that meeting, which took place during the government’s investigation, showed “criminal arrogance” on the part of Weiss.
Weiss pleaded guilty to a federal racketeering conspiracy charge, admitting he lied to judges and secretly paid kickbacks to plaintiffs, in cash or through intermediary law firms, as part of a criminal enterprise that lasted 25 years.
2003 Meeting Took Place
During The Public Investigation
More than 275 letters were submitted by former judges, law professors and lawyers — a collection that Brafman referred to at Monday’s hearing as a “breathtaking array of extraordinary work.”
Axel said that Weiss was “right in the thick of this conspiracy”….
Unlike Lerach, Weiss did not withdraw from the conspiracy after the government’s investigation began, Walter said.
Walter ordered Weiss to pay $5 million of the forfeiture within the next seven days; the remaining is due in 180 days.
He said his “contrition is profoundly genuine” and that his punishment great, given he would lose his “life’s passion and my ability to earn a living as a professional.”
About Criminal Fee Double Double Plus Dipping Arrogance
In light of my “padding class case billings” files, marked A-Z, one cemented ring Mel & Coughlin & Lerach refuse to withdraw from is stuff like this artificial number verifications. I know, they’ve pulled that trick in series of major cases for decades now.
On Trust
“IT” Code
The Home Run
The Cartwright Act Elements
The Cartwright Act is California’s antitrust statute. “Maintaining completely free and open competition so that “the public may receive better goods and [complex lit] services at a lower cost” is purpose of the Cartwright Act. Federal Sherman Act cases are instructive on Cartwright Act problems. Unlike the Cartwright Act, however, the plain language of the Sherman Act, does not instruct as to its analytical framework. Sections 16722 and 16725 establish the per se rule of illegality and a case-by-case analysis of a combination’s “purpose” and “effect.
The antitrust laws were designed to be a comprehensive charter of economic liberty aimed at preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade. It rests on the premise that the unrestrained interaction of competitive forces will yield the best allocation of our economic resources, the lowest prices, the highest quality and the greatest material progress, while at the same time providing an environment conducive to the preservation of our democratic political and social institutions. But even were that premise open to question, the policy unequivocally laid down by the Act is competition. In the vindication of this policy any combination which tampers with the price structure is unlawful.1 The Cartwright Act makes unlawful all “trusts,” defined as “a combination of capital, skill or acts by two or more persons [in and/or out house] for any of the following purposes: (a) to create or carry out restrictions in [any] trade or commerce…. (e) To make or enter into or execute or carry out any contracts, obligations or agreements of any kind or description, by which they [a]gree to pool, combine, or directly or indirectly unite any interests that they may have connected with the sale…of any…[Complex lit legal service to the court] commodity, that its price might in any manner be affected. (Emphasis).
Contracts or agreements in violation of the Act’s provisions are “void and unenforceable” and subject to injunction and civil actions for damages.
Contained in our posted “IT” files are inside details from marked surveys fitting every one of the elements of the prima facie felony “Trust” action:
http://cid-77d0ff7ab3786013.skydrive.live.com/browse.aspx/X%20Box%20Gates%20-%20Silent%20X%20Systems
Len Simon Mel & Pat’s Enron So
Called Document [Box] Clerks Hourly Rig
$165 to $210 per hour X 8,346.20 hours = $1,619,368.25
Mel & Pat have cemented their attempt before the honorable Justice Harmon to secure for themselves that 1.6 million times five, under oath, with zero supporting documents of any explanation for mammoth over 8 million dollars. That’s a micro bit:
$194 per hour for loading, transporting, unloading documents – Milberg & Coughlin’s hourly sticker price tag is more than most attorneys. But PC & Mel want that times five, aka, $970 per hour – My Pro Esquire rate is 3.333 (PI) of that.
“Criminal Arrogance” – B., Max Coughlin – Weiss’
But he [Judge Walter] said he was troubled about Weiss’ conduct during a November 2003 meeting at which kickback payments were discussed with a lawyer for one of the lead plaintiffs, Howard Vogel. In court papers, prosecutors had said that meeting, which took place during the government’s investigation, showed “criminal arrogance” on the part of Weiss.
Weiss pleaded guilty to a federal racketeering conspiracy charge, admitting he lied to judges and secretly paid kickbacks to plaintiffs, in cash or through intermediary law firms, as part of a criminal enterprise that lasted 25 years.
2003 Meeting Took Place
During The Public Investigation
More than 275 letters were submitted by former judges, law professors and lawyers — a collection that Brafman referred to at Monday’s hearing as a “breathtaking array of extraordinary work.”
Axel said that Weiss was “right in the thick of this conspiracy”….
Unlike Lerach, Weiss did not withdraw from the conspiracy after the government’s investigation began, Walter said.
Walter ordered Weiss to pay $5 million of the forfeiture within the next seven days; the remaining is due in 180 days.
He said his “contrition is profoundly genuine” and that his punishment great, given he would lose his “life’s passion and my ability to earn a living as a professional.”
About Criminal Fee Double Double Plus Dipping Arrogance
In light of my “padding class case billings” files, marked A-Z, one cemented ring Mel & Coughlin & Lerach refuse to withdraw from is stuff like this artificial number verifications. I know, they’ve pulled that trick in series of major cases for decades now.