Buca Friedman

Gary Joseph Bonas II
26255 Bungalow Court
Valencia, California 91355

February 17, 2009

Edward C. Hugler webteam@ios.doi.gov
J.D. Pepperdine, 1976 Labor Standards Enforcement
U.S. Department of Labor
Retaliation Complaint Investigation Unit
200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210

Greetings Division Of United Labor & Retaliation Investigation Unit:

Today, 02-17-09 I received your letter mailed to me on 02-13-09, from united territory zip code 95829, in response to my letter to you dated 02-10-09. To being, I very much appreciate your incredibly quick turn-around time. Enclosed are the documents you asked me to fill out, with the following background, as requested.

First, naturally all documents I sign (or checks I cash or have cashed) now (& ever have & ever will) are executed (without writing it) under your foreign-domestic U.C.C 1-207 “without prejudice” born right not to be a second class classified ½ or sub-citizen, by U.C.C. “good”, “leased people goods – leases” or “negotiable instrument” or “agricultural commodity” or “farm product” attempted felony classification.

Second, to supplement the sequence of events leading to callous and inhumane “on the spot” termination by Buca’s Jeff Friedman, John Bettin & Parent in house counsel, Planet Hollywood’s Martha McIntosh, I present the following dated materials – Attached short Exhibits memos to management dated 02-07-09 (the trigger), 02-10-09 (the on the spot firing, issuing a “do not speak or enter order”, and the next day 02-11-09 (By Overnight 10 A.M. Delivery on 02-12-09) malicious and callous termination fraud for nicely raising real simple points covered.

Third, the fact that J. Friedman criminally assaulted me on 02-10-09, after falsely imprisoning me for interrogation by physically blocking the only way for me to exit the “closed door break room at will, to bully be into submission was directly witnessed by another. And about the hostile DV gag order Mr. Friedman issued, another anonymous person wrote to me about it, verbatim:

After looking around last night and wondering where … my friend was … I was shocked to hear that … Friedman literally threw you out of the restaurant. Cash, there are more people at work that are going to miss you; the hard, teamwork that you show. The friendliness that you showed all the staff (including the ones that didn’t want to be friendly [Noelle Scott & Dena Ciofa, who sadly skims from our team].

Warmest Regards,

Gary Joseph Bonas II

See IT

Business Watch 23

IceRocket Tags: Price,Class,Complex,Void,Contracts,unenforceable,absolutely,16722,Sherman

Rain Maker Law Codes – AAA E.T. Al

Michele L. Cook, Esquire – AAA=

Make Checks Payable to ACSC

333 Fairview Road A451

Costa Mesa, Cal. 92626-1698

Date:    11-29-07

 

            Ms. Cook, Esq & FMC et al.

 

            Today I received your stamped 11-27-07 INS letter, which reads, verbatim:

 

A)                We have no record of receiving a payment.

 

Again, that is a lie, because you have the same record I have, which marks that I paid you, in person, in cash, $246.21 on 11-08-07 at 15:49:13 military time, 3:49 civilian time, just like I did on the following marked days:

 

A)                Thursday 11-08-07 – I paid you, under duress, cash $246.21, confirmed;

B)                 Saturday 10-06-07 – I paid you, under duress, cash $248.40, confirmed; &

C)                Thursday 09-06-07 – I paid you, under duress, money order $120.70.

 

This time, unlike some of the others, you did not furnish me your breakdown of your sickening “finance” charge, because you finance nothing.  You did, however, include it, exactly like you did on in my 11-08-07 payment to you.

 

            Next, again, you say, verbatim:

 

A)                The required full payment [$244.02] must be postmarked (or paid in our offices) before 12:01 a.m. Pacific Standard Time on December 8, 2007.

B)                 Notice of Cancellation.  Failure to receive full payment will cause the above identified policy to be cancelled and all coverage will cease [then].

 

Thank you for confirming to me & every single other one of your clients, expressly, again, that if We do not pay your so called “finance” based on nothing charge that you will cancel US from your privately required, already fully paid for coverage!

 

            Using round numbers, you deceitfully converted your original offer of INS to me, which sticker price tag offer I never accepted, from $1,970.00, with a $91 rebate, to roughly $3,000.00 a year.  You know your McBean counter “records” reflect that, by forecast.  On 6-27-07 I wrote you, verbatim:  [Y] … made me an INS credit [solilcitation] … for an annual package of $1970.00, plus interest.  You represent that that is not an artificially inflated peg, then you offer me what you call a: $91.00 [REBATE] DIVIDEND!

 

            You play flat mono games, praying on our fears, outrageously, knowing better.[1]  Do you know what economic (e) contract treason is, Ms. Cook, Esq., by definition!

 

Respectfully

---

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consideration_under_American_law

I-CON CODES

Date:    04-19-08

 

            Greetings Mr. C I-Con & Team:

 

            This is part B of my direct proposal presentation.  With Part A in mind, this follows:

 

            First, as you are no doubt aware, generally A.G./D.O.J. addresses concerns in part, leaving main monetary resolution to the private sector, which is what the very top Complex Lit Class Action “invest in” and “capitalize on.”  There is a long list of examples, but the Nasdaq price fixing case serves as a “middle of the road” example.

 

In Nasdaq the public authorities did file & address “injunctive” like changes to address certain market maker missteps.  The private sector squared up that EZ case for 1.27 billion dollars cash and about $140 million in attorneys’ fees.  Unfortunately (or fortunately for us), the lead plaintiff’s counsel in that case (Chris Lovell, Mel Weiss, Bill Lerach & Michael Hausfeld & Kaplan) weren’t exactly honest with the court from a defined world of marked factual angles:

 

Ex        06-06-06 – All Major Case Lead Counsel’s Contempt of Pro Rata Attorney Fee Order

 

You might know Professor’s Christie & Shultz, whose one article triggered the wave of filings in that “sure thing” case, which complex lit reality lead counsel were less than candid about when asking for their big multiplier over their inflated hourly rates in that case.  On that note, about Complex Class Lead Counsel’s law not “acute” law games, I quote from the esteemed Dr. Ken Elzinga, verbatim:

 

A.             [Complex Lit Lead Counsel C]artels ‑‑ the German expression is a “Cartel‑meister,” the master of the cartel, person who organizes it, runs it operates it, sort of the genius behind the cartel, the person that consumers should dislike very much.[1]  Ken Elzinga under oath, on trial, page 3940:15-25.

 

            Second, so you know, owing to the current “contract” climate, my offer comes with the attached triple “immunity shield” &  “Grandfather clause” for the “invited only:

 

Ex            Immunity Clause

Ex            Grandfather Clause

Ex        The Law Of One Flag

Ex        Loss Of Citizenship – Rules “The United States [UCC] government is a foreign corporation….”[2]  - By Contract – EZ Class Action

 

            Last, If you’d like to arrange a meeting to discuss this matter, I am available on Monday!  My private, unlisted number is 999-999-078 .  God Bless America!

 

Sincerely,

---

[1] Ken Elzinga under oath, on trial, page 3940:15-25.

[2] NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!