Buca Friedman

Gary Joseph Bonas II
26255 Bungalow Court
Valencia, California 91355

February 17, 2009

Edward C. Hugler webteam@ios.doi.gov
J.D. Pepperdine, 1976 Labor Standards Enforcement
U.S. Department of Labor
Retaliation Complaint Investigation Unit
200 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20210

Greetings Division Of United Labor & Retaliation Investigation Unit:

Today, 02-17-09 I received your letter mailed to me on 02-13-09, from united territory zip code 95829, in response to my letter to you dated 02-10-09. To being, I very much appreciate your incredibly quick turn-around time. Enclosed are the documents you asked me to fill out, with the following background, as requested.

First, naturally all documents I sign (or checks I cash or have cashed) now (& ever have & ever will) are executed (without writing it) under your foreign-domestic U.C.C 1-207 “without prejudice” born right not to be a second class classified ½ or sub-citizen, by U.C.C. “good”, “leased people goods – leases” or “negotiable instrument” or “agricultural commodity” or “farm product” attempted felony classification.

Second, to supplement the sequence of events leading to callous and inhumane “on the spot” termination by Buca’s Jeff Friedman, John Bettin & Parent in house counsel, Planet Hollywood’s Martha McIntosh, I present the following dated materials – Attached short Exhibits memos to management dated 02-07-09 (the trigger), 02-10-09 (the on the spot firing, issuing a “do not speak or enter order”, and the next day 02-11-09 (By Overnight 10 A.M. Delivery on 02-12-09) malicious and callous termination fraud for nicely raising real simple points covered.

Third, the fact that J. Friedman criminally assaulted me on 02-10-09, after falsely imprisoning me for interrogation by physically blocking the only way for me to exit the “closed door break room at will, to bully be into submission was directly witnessed by another. And about the hostile DV gag order Mr. Friedman issued, another anonymous person wrote to me about it, verbatim:

After looking around last night and wondering where … my friend was … I was shocked to hear that … Friedman literally threw you out of the restaurant. Cash, there are more people at work that are going to miss you; the hard, teamwork that you show. The friendliness that you showed all the staff (including the ones that didn’t want to be friendly [Noelle Scott & Dena Ciofa, who sadly skims from our team].

Warmest Regards,

Gary Joseph Bonas II

Abuser’s Sideways Stragety

On Male Abusers Who 100% Invert Reality

 

Abuser’s Jealousy Sin Factor, confirmed on 07-22-07, verbatim:

 

A)                I am going to have your LITTLE LOVER thrown in jail….  Now you are IN LOVE and I am going to throw your LITTLE LOVERS As* in jail…”

 

Abuser’s act to block the X from educating herself confirmed, on 10-18-07, verbatim:

 

B)                [Y]our …friend … told me he is [tutoring &] training you to write this way.[1]   

C)                “I am going to expose this [tutor] guy [friend of yours] to everyone;

 

Abuser’s polluted words about being immune from law & order, verbatim:

 

D)                Go F*** yourself;

E)                 I’ll do whatever I want”;

F)      I don’t give a sh-t about the court order.”

G)      I don’t give a sh-t about the [family] court order.”[2]

 

            Abuser’s dirty lies & sideways attacks when he loses victim control, verbatim:

 

H)                [H]e [your tutor] is … convicted ….;

I)                   [H]e [your teacher] is … drug addicted;

J)                   [H]e [your friend] is … a psycho looser; [3]

K)                He is using methane & is a drug addict [everyone says so].[4]

F)                 “[He] … is a tweeker…he threatens to kill people…he is a drug head….he is psycho…he threatened to kill peoples family’s and their kids…he held a gun at a woman’s chest….”[5]

 

Abuser’s flipping reality to degrade and harm his victims into submission, verbatim:

 

A)                Your so dirty you couldn’t come clean if you fell into a pool of acid.

B)                No wonder the best… man? you can find  is a 4 time convicted felon, a drug addicted psycho looser, a guy who can’t even [get] … a dishwashing/hosting job.

C)                Have a nice night….sleep well; [6]

 

            Abusers calculate and spend much sinister energy, behind closed doors not in public, causing their victims to doubt themselves, repeatedly belittling them, badgering them, blocking their academic, economic growth and home harmony.

 

Dr. Phil Harmonics – Bad Girl Grandma

---

[1]See  Ex   10-18-07

[2] See Ex 10-29-07

From: <d.bernardino@ca.rr.com>To: <p-anna@ca.rr.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:45 PM Subject: Re: [Kids Dental concerns and Headaches]–

[4] See Ex 10-29-07.

[5] See Ex 07-21-07

From: <d.bernardino@ca.rr.com>To: <p-anna@ca.rr.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:45 PM Subject: Re: [Kids Dental concerns and Headaches]–

Moore @:

http://current.com/people/Bonas

TRUST

Honorable Judges Clerk

San Fernando Family Courthouse

900 Third Street, San Fernando, Calif. 91340

 

            Thank you for your invitation to my formal presentation pertaining to the codes.  So you know, Mr. Dan Bernardino (“D”) has repeatedly & correctly confirmed that I, not him, have many “issues.”  You have seen a quick peek of those in my due speech to you,

 

            Recently, so you know, Mr. Bernardino told my seventeen year old girl, verbatim:

 

[DON’T pick to LIVE WITH YOUR MOM].  If you [Lani] &

Brennan come & pick to] LIVE WITH ME YOU WILL BE RICH.

 

            Part of my EX PARTE application is real simple math, addition & division.  Due to Mr. D’s & his employers, Universal Studio’s Ron Meyer (President/COO) & his parent, NBC’s Jeff Zucker (President/CEO) et al, more than un-cooperative acts & failures to disclose what is required, I shall base my presentation on my D. Bernardino’s base pay of $200,000.00, which is less than what my “D’s” 2003 base was.  That said, Mr. “D” told our minor Lani, in repeated contempt of the Honorable Judge Ito, verbatim,

 

“I get half of Dan’s pay check, by court order” so you know.

 

Shifting, my peaceful, straight by the book parenting efforts are date marked, receipt confirmed.  Highlights include:

 

A)                Ex  6-21-7 – Your financial [60/40 & 50/50 of all] duty – what’s up?;

B)                Ex  6-28-7 – You never asked me to pay your 40%/50% overhead; &

C)                Ex  7-7-7  - Dan vowed, in his words to, “make my life a living hell”;

 

See My Ex File 1.  Also, Ex File 2 contains some of my pager files detailing my “D” disclosures, including:

 

A)                My income production proof, to the named, all in accord; &

B)                My requests for the same from the above, in accord;

 

            Another linked “D” issue, Ex File 3, so you know, is “D’s” conversion:

 

A)                The over 2 year conversion of ordered 40/60 (50/50 summer) time/money;

 

To clarify my 10^th Amen “vested” classification, which I know well, I have attached some of my one pager EX File 4.

 

Lastly, on a professional note, for others, I’m happy to furnish to you my estate & law homework about, e.g., emoluments & Title 26 USC – section 163(h)(3)(B) (ii) Limitation The … amount treated as home … indebtedness [14^th Amen] … shall not exceed $100,000 ($50,000 in the case of a separate return by a married individual).[1]

 

I swear under penalty of perjury the facts stated above are true.

 

Date:   11-6-07                                    By: 

---

[1] Title 26 USC – section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii), $1,000,000.

McFeeder Con Artist – DA-2 UCC All Cap

Game On – Head On Dunkel Wiffle Law Ball Defector DA Cooley:

Interview Of The District Attorney’s Anti-Compliance

 

            Today is June 3, 2008.  I phoned the S-CV District Attorneys Juvenile Division today at 3:30 PM and spoke with the clerk about my son’s abduction & being assaulted with a lethal weapon.  The clerk transferred me to Nora Hernandez who was helpful, patient and informative.  This is a paraphrased verbatim summary:

 

            I quickly introduced myself to Nora and gave her a quick review of my first hand experience in trying to procure my son’s arrest report.  Nora was very helpful and cooperative.  She checked her database for the report and found nothing.  She said that it is likely that the District Attorney’s office has not yet received the report and that is why it is not in her database.  She also said, verbatim:

 

            “Reports come from the court not the DA [Inc].”

            “They have 10 days before the hearing date to submit the file.”

            “They sometime get the report at the court date.”

            “They don’t give reports to parents of minors, only attorney’s representing them.”

            “It is against the law [lie] for them to provide the parents with the reports.”

 

            I told Nora about the incident on May 21, 2008 when my son Brennan Bernardino was assaulted with a lethal weapon, kidnapped & terrorized by a local terrorist neighbor  (who turned out to be an off duty officer) who held a gun to his head and initiated a false arrest against & planted false evidence for show against my son, according to the declarations to date. I asked Nora if I could submit my investigation & our declarations to the District Attorney prior to the court date.  Nora told me No, verbatim:

 

            “Charges may not be filed against your son.”

            “It is up to the District Attorney’s office and there is nothing in their data yet.”

            “No – you can’t give us your research because that is not how it is done.”

 

            I thanked Nora for her time.  I let her know that I intend to get that report before the hearing regardless if they are to file charges or not.  I debriefed her again on the incident and let her know that is not possible for the District Attorney to make remotely competent indictment evaluation on whether to charge or not when his decision is based a defective, undisclosed “one sided” polemics argument.  My son’s declaration is not part of the DA’s file and the owner of the vehicle is not pressing charges, so the only crime committed would be the crime against my son, which you abuse your duty to act on by failing to investigate that aspect of this deliberate indifference hate crime.

 

            Nora explained to me that generally, the tickets are given and the District Attorneys office reviews the cases as they come in.  The cases should come in at least 10 days before the court date but sometimes they don’t.  Sometimes they come in on the court date.    When you get to court, the judge lets you know if they have decided to move forward or if they decide to drop the charges. 

 

            I swear under penalty of perjury the facts presented are paraphrased true.

 

June 3, 2008                                                             By

See IT

Business Watch 23

IceRocket Tags: Price,Class,Complex,Void,Contracts,unenforceable,absolutely,16722,Sherman

Rain Maker Law Codes – AAA E.T. Al

Michele L. Cook, Esquire – AAA=

Make Checks Payable to ACSC

333 Fairview Road A451

Costa Mesa, Cal. 92626-1698

Date:    11-29-07

 

            Ms. Cook, Esq & FMC et al.

 

            Today I received your stamped 11-27-07 INS letter, which reads, verbatim:

 

A)                We have no record of receiving a payment.

 

Again, that is a lie, because you have the same record I have, which marks that I paid you, in person, in cash, $246.21 on 11-08-07 at 15:49:13 military time, 3:49 civilian time, just like I did on the following marked days:

 

A)                Thursday 11-08-07 – I paid you, under duress, cash $246.21, confirmed;

B)                 Saturday 10-06-07 – I paid you, under duress, cash $248.40, confirmed; &

C)                Thursday 09-06-07 – I paid you, under duress, money order $120.70.

 

This time, unlike some of the others, you did not furnish me your breakdown of your sickening “finance” charge, because you finance nothing.  You did, however, include it, exactly like you did on in my 11-08-07 payment to you.

 

            Next, again, you say, verbatim:

 

A)                The required full payment [$244.02] must be postmarked (or paid in our offices) before 12:01 a.m. Pacific Standard Time on December 8, 2007.

B)                 Notice of Cancellation.  Failure to receive full payment will cause the above identified policy to be cancelled and all coverage will cease [then].

 

Thank you for confirming to me & every single other one of your clients, expressly, again, that if We do not pay your so called “finance” based on nothing charge that you will cancel US from your privately required, already fully paid for coverage!

 

            Using round numbers, you deceitfully converted your original offer of INS to me, which sticker price tag offer I never accepted, from $1,970.00, with a $91 rebate, to roughly $3,000.00 a year.  You know your McBean counter “records” reflect that, by forecast.  On 6-27-07 I wrote you, verbatim:  [Y] … made me an INS credit [solilcitation] … for an annual package of $1970.00, plus interest.  You represent that that is not an artificially inflated peg, then you offer me what you call a: $91.00 [REBATE] DIVIDEND!

 

            You play flat mono games, praying on our fears, outrageously, knowing better.[1]  Do you know what economic (e) contract treason is, Ms. Cook, Esq., by definition!

 

Respectfully

---

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consideration_under_American_law

I-CON CODES

Date:    04-19-08

 

            Greetings Mr. C I-Con & Team:

 

            This is part B of my direct proposal presentation.  With Part A in mind, this follows:

 

            First, as you are no doubt aware, generally A.G./D.O.J. addresses concerns in part, leaving main monetary resolution to the private sector, which is what the very top Complex Lit Class Action “invest in” and “capitalize on.”  There is a long list of examples, but the Nasdaq price fixing case serves as a “middle of the road” example.

 

In Nasdaq the public authorities did file & address “injunctive” like changes to address certain market maker missteps.  The private sector squared up that EZ case for 1.27 billion dollars cash and about $140 million in attorneys’ fees.  Unfortunately (or fortunately for us), the lead plaintiff’s counsel in that case (Chris Lovell, Mel Weiss, Bill Lerach & Michael Hausfeld & Kaplan) weren’t exactly honest with the court from a defined world of marked factual angles:

 

Ex        06-06-06 – All Major Case Lead Counsel’s Contempt of Pro Rata Attorney Fee Order

 

You might know Professor’s Christie & Shultz, whose one article triggered the wave of filings in that “sure thing” case, which complex lit reality lead counsel were less than candid about when asking for their big multiplier over their inflated hourly rates in that case.  On that note, about Complex Class Lead Counsel’s law not “acute” law games, I quote from the esteemed Dr. Ken Elzinga, verbatim:

 

A.             [Complex Lit Lead Counsel C]artels ‑‑ the German expression is a “Cartel‑meister,” the master of the cartel, person who organizes it, runs it operates it, sort of the genius behind the cartel, the person that consumers should dislike very much.[1]  Ken Elzinga under oath, on trial, page 3940:15-25.

 

            Second, so you know, owing to the current “contract” climate, my offer comes with the attached triple “immunity shield” &  “Grandfather clause” for the “invited only:

 

Ex            Immunity Clause

Ex            Grandfather Clause

Ex        The Law Of One Flag

Ex        Loss Of Citizenship – Rules “The United States [UCC] government is a foreign corporation….”[2]  - By Contract – EZ Class Action

 

            Last, If you’d like to arrange a meeting to discuss this matter, I am available on Monday!  My private, unlisted number is 999-999-078 .  God Bless America!

 

Sincerely,

---

[1] Ken Elzinga under oath, on trial, page 3940:15-25.

[2] NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!